PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1999AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology60 citations

Systemic arterial compliance is reduced in young patients with IDDM

View Full Paper
KBKaren L. BerryRSR. Andrew P. Skyrme-JonesJCJames D. Cameron

Key Result

Young patients with uncomplicated IDDM had 29% lower systemic arterial compliance compared with age-matched controls (0.46 vs. 0.65 arbitrary compliance units, P < 0.05).

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine if young patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) have reduced arterial compliance.
  • Assessed systemic arterial compliance and flow-mediated vasodilation in 25 individuals with IDDM and 30 controls.
  • Measured aortic blood flow and carotid arterial pressure to evaluate arterial compliance.
  • Compared various health metrics such as blood pressure and lipid levels between groups.
  • Arterial compliance was 29% lower in IDDM subjects compared to controls (0.46 vs. 0.65 arbitrary compliance units, P < 0.05).
  • No differences in blood pressure, lipid levels, or physical activity were found between groups.
  • Compliance was not linked to endothelial function, duration of disease, or glycemic control.

Study Design

Type

Case-Control (n=55)

Structured PICO

Does uncomplicated IDDM reduce systemic arterial compliance in young patients before the development of overt vascular disease?

P
Population
55 young individuals, including 25 with uncomplicated IDDM and 30 age-matched healthy controls, assessed for systemic arterial compliance and endothelial function.
E
Exposure
Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM)
C
Comparator
Age-matched healthy controls
O
Outcome
Systemic arterial compliance (determined via simultaneous measurements of aortic blood flow and carotid arterial pressure)surrogate

Young patients with uncomplicated IDDM exhibit significantly reduced systemic arterial compliance compared to healthy controls, suggesting early vascular changes before overt disease.

Main Result

Effect estimate: 29% lower

Absolute Event Rate: 0.46% vs 0.65%

p-value: p=< 0.05

Abstract

Arterial elastic properties are altered with increasing age and in various disease states, including non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Whether young patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) have reduced arterial compliance before developing endothelial dysfunction or overt micro- and macrovascular disease is unclear. Systemic arterial compliance and endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) was assessed in 25 individuals with uncomplicated IDDM (23 +/- 4 yr, 14 females and 11 males) and compared with 30 age-matched controls (15 females and 15 males). Arterial compliance was determined via simultaneous measurements of aortic blood flow and carotid arterial pressure. The relationship between arterial compliance and endothelial function (assessed by brachial artery FMD) was also examined. Arterial compliance was 29% lower in IDDM subjects compared with control subjects (0.46 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.65 +/- 0.07 arbitrary compliance units, P < 0.05). Blood pressure, lipid levels, and daily energy expenditure (a measure of physical activity levels) were not different between groups. Compliance in the IDDM group was not related to the integrity of endothelial vasodilator function, disease duration, or degree of glycemic control. Arterial compliance is reduced in young patients with IDDM before the development of overt micro- or macrovascular disease. Early assessment of arterial compliance may be useful in predicting the development of diabetic vascular complications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berry et al. (1999) conducted a case-control in Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) (n=55). Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) vs. Age-matched healthy controls was evaluated on Systemic arterial compliance (29% lower, p=< 0.05). Young patients with uncomplicated IDDM had 29% lower systemic arterial compliance compared with age-matched controls (0.46 vs. 0.65 arbitrary compliance units, P < 0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a61e2ef6e9a4038e37d916bhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.6.h1839
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper