PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 1997Archives of Internal Medicine115 citations

Treatment and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Patients of Cardiologists and Generalist Physicians

View Full Paper
JAJohn Z. Ayanian

Key Result

Treatment by attending cardiologists compared with generalist physicians was not associated with a significant difference in adjusted 1-year mortality (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.76-1.35).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,620)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does care by attending cardiologists compared to generalist physicians improve 1-year mortality in Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
1,620 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 to 79 years treated for acute myocardial infarction at 285 hospitals in Texas, followed for 1 year.
E
Exposure
Care by attending cardiologists
C
Comparator
Care by attending generalist physicians
O
Outcome
1-year mortalityhard clinical

Although cardiologists utilized certain evidence-based therapies and procedures more frequently than generalists, this did not result in a significant difference in adjusted 1-year mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 1.01 (95% CI 0.76–1.35)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both cardiologists and generalist physicians care for patients with acute myocardial infarction, but little is known about their patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. METHODS: We identified attending and consulting physicians, patient characteristics, drugs, procedures, and mortality from clinical and administrative records of 1620 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 to 79 years who were treated for acute myocardial infarction at 285 hospitals in Texas during 1990. RESULTS: Patients treated by attending cardiologists were younger, had prior congestive heart failure less frequently, and were initially treated in hospitals offering coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery more often than patients treated by attending generalist physicians (for each, P<.004). Adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, cardiologists were more likely than generalist physicians to prescribe thrombolytic therapy and aspirin (P<.05) but not beta-adrenergic blocking agents (beta-blockers). Cardiologists used coronary angiography and angioplasty more often (P<.003), but not echocardiography or exercise testing. Adjusted 1-year mortality did not differ significantly between patients of attending cardiologists and generalist physicians (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.35) or between patients of generalist physicians with and without a consulting cardiologist (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.16). However, patients initially admitted to hospitals offering coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery had lower adjusted 1-year mortality than patients admitted to other hospitals (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with generalist physicians, cardiologists used some, but not all, effective drugs more frequently, as well as coronary angiography and angioplasty. Although these differences were not associated with lower adjusted mortality among cardiologists' patients, cardiologists were more likely to treat patients in hospitals with better outcomes. Future studies should identify organizational factors that improve outcomes of myocardial infarction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

John Z. Ayanian (1997) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=1,620). Treatment by attending cardiologists vs. Treatment by attending generalist physicians was evaluated on Adjusted 1-year mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.76-1.35). Treatment by attending cardiologists compared with generalist physicians was not associated with a significant difference in adjusted 1-year mortality (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.76-1.35).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a623167f2fc5dc74fc21949https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1997.00440430048006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Process and Outcome of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction among Medicare Beneficiaries in Connecticut: A Quality Improvement Demonstration Project1995 · 68 citations
  2. 2Predicting Who Dies Depends on How Severity Is Measured: Implications for Evaluating Patient Outcomes1995 · 167 citations
  3. 3Measuring Quality of Care With Explicit Process Criteria Before and After Implementation of the DRG-Based Prospective Payment System1990 · 296 citations
  4. 4Regional Variation across the United States in the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction1996 · 241 citations
  5. 5Aspirin in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries1995 · 187 citations