Obtaining hip congruity before four years of age promotes continued acetabular growth, whereas correction of anteversion and neck/shaft angles alone is not of major importance.
Cohort (n=74)
Does the age of congruity, femoral anteversion, and neck/shaft angles influence acetabular growth in children with congenital dislocation of the hip?
In congenital dislocation of the hip, achieving congruity before 4 years of age is critical for promoting satisfactory acetabular growth, whereas correction of anteversion and neck/shaft angles alone appears less important.
The factors which determine the rate and amount of acetabular growth in congenital dislocation of the hip are ill-understood. A prospective radiological study has been devised in order to assess the influence of the age of congruity, femoral anteversion and neck/shaft angles on acetabular growth. To be included, the children must have reached at least 8 years of age. Those with associated congenital abnormalities and subluxation were excluded, as were those who had operations for acetabular reconstruction. Seventy-four hips were suitable for analysis, and the age range at follow-up was from 8 to 17 years. The acetabular angle was used as an index of acetabular growth. Measurement of this angle, and the anteversion and neck/shaft angles were made before, and each year after reduction of the hip. Congruity was assessed from a radiograph with the legs in the functional position. A satisfactory acetabulum was obtained in 44 hips and the mean age of congruity was 33 months; the acetabulum was unsatisfactory in 30 hips, with a mean age of congruity of 48 months. Four years is the critical age, for if congruity is obtained later, the risk of producing a moderate or severely dysplastic acetabulum is more than doubled. If congruity is obtained under four years of age, growth of the acetabulum with continue in most patients up to 8 and in some to 11 YEARS OF age; the resulting acetabulum was normal or mildly dysplastic. Fifty-nine per cent of the satisfactory hips at follow-up had a normal anteversion angle, and 6 per cent a normal neck/shaft angle. Correction of these angles by themselves, seems not to be a major importance for promoting acetabular growth.
N H Harris (1976) conducted a cohort in Congenital dislocation of the hip (n=74). Age of congruity under 4 years vs. Age of congruity 4 years or older was evaluated on Acetabular growth (assessed by acetabular angle). Obtaining hip congruity before four years of age promotes continued acetabular growth, whereas correction of anteversion and neck/shaft angles alone is not of major importance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: