PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 24, 2026International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics0 citationsOpen Access

First‐trimester maternal abdominal subcutaneous and perirenal fat thickness and early identification of gestational diabetes: A prospective cohort study

View Full Paper
GPG. PallaMGMaria Magdalena Montt GuevaraTFTiziana Fidecicchi

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess if fat thickness measurements enhance early identification of gestational diabetes and their link to complications.
  • Conducted as a prospective cohort study at the University of Pisa, Italy, from 2019-2020.
  • Measured abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness and renal fat thickness using transabdominal ultrasound.
  • Evaluated associations with gestational diabetes via logistic regression and determined predictive performance with ROC curves.
  • Gestational diabetes developed in 23.9% of the cohort.
  • Women with gestational diabetes showed higher body mass index and fasting glycemia with significant associations (P < 0.001).
  • ASFT remained independently associated with gestational diabetes (OR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.17-4.72; P = 0.016) after BMI adjustment.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether first-trimester abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (ASFT) and renal fat thickness (RFT) provide incremental value for early identification of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their association with obstetric complications. METHODS: weeks) at the Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pisa, Italy (2019-2020). ASFT and RFT were measured by transabdominal ultrasound. Fasting glycemia, pre-gestational body mass index (BMI), and weight gain were recorded. GDM was diagnosed by standard oral glucose tolerance test. Associations with GDM were evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Predictive performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and model comparison. Obstetric complications were prospectively documented. RESULTS: GDM developed in 23.9% of the cohort. Women with GDM had higher BMI, first-trimester glycemia, upper and lower ASFT (all P < 0.001), and RFT (P < 0.01). After adjustment for BMI, ASFT-but not RFT-remained associated with GDM. A composite ASFT variable based on predefined cutoffs remained independently associated with GDM (odds ratio OR 2.31, 95% confidence interval CI: 1.17-4.72; P = 0.016). Inclusion of ASFT slightly improved model discrimination (area under the curve AUC 0.75 vs. 0.71). Using guideline-based risk factors alone, sensitivity for GDM detection was 85.9%, increasing to 95.3% after addition of ASFT, with reduced specificity. Neither ASFT nor RFT predicted obstetric complications. CONCLUSION: First-trimester ASFT measurement was independently associated with GDM risk and showed incremental predictive value beyond conventional clinical risk factors. These findings support further investigation of ultrasound markers of maternal adiposity for early risk assessment in pregnancy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Palla et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a63008d395161722cd157c8https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71242
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper