PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2018PLoS ONE165 citationsOpen Access

Trends in congenital anomalies in Europe from 1980 to 2012

View Full Paper
JMJoan K. MorrisASAnna SpringettRGRuth Greenlees

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of congenital anomalies is important to identify potential teratogens. METHODS: This study analysed the prevalence of 61 congenital anomaly subgroups (excluding chromosomal) in 25 population-based EUROCAT registries (1980-2012). Live births, fetal deaths and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly were analysed with multilevel random-effects Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Seventeen anomaly subgroups had statistically significant trends from 2003-2012; 12 increasing and 5 decreasing. CONCLUSIONS: The annual increasing prevalence of severe congenital heart defects, single ventricle, atrioventricular septal defects and tetralogy of Fallot of 1.4% (95% CI: 0.7% to 2.0%), 4.6% (1.0% to 8.2%), 3.4% (1.3% to 5.5%) and 4.1% (2.4% to 5.7%) respectively may reflect increases in maternal obesity and diabetes (known risk factors). The increased prevalence of cystic adenomatous malformation of the lung 6.5% (3.5% to 9.4%) and decreased prevalence of limb reduction defects -2.8% (-4.2% to -1.5%) are unexplained. For renal dysplasia and maternal infections, increasing trends may be explained by increased screening, and deceases in patent ductus arteriosus at term and increases in craniosynostosis, by improved follow up period after birth and improved diagnosis. For oesophageal atresia, duodenal atresia/stenosis and ano-rectal atresia/stenosis recent changes in prevalence appeared incidental when compared with larger long term fluctuations. For microcephaly and congenital hydronephrosis trends could not be interpreted due to discrepancies in diagnostic criteria. The trends for club foot and syndactyly disappeared once registries with disparate results were excluded. No decrease in neural tube defects was detected, despite efforts at prevention through folic acid supplementation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morris et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6301b84f5ef41b946a911chttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194986
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reduction of birth prevalence rates of neural tube defects after folic acid fortification in Chile2005 · 180 citations
  2. 2Modeling Zika Virus Infection in Pregnancy2016 · 110 citations
  3. 3The history of thalidomide2002 · 92 citations
  4. 4The History and Medical Consequences of Rubella1985 · 147 citations
  5. 5Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: a systematic review based on 173 687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls2011 · 670 citations