PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 14, 2010Phytopathology136 citations

Control of Fire Blight by Pseudomonas fluorescens A506 and Pantoea vagans C9-1 Applied as Single Strains and Mixed Inocula

View Full Paper
VSVirginia O. StockwellKJK. B. JohnsonDŠD. Šugar

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The biological control agents Pseudomonas fluorescens A506 and Pantoea vagans C9-1 were evaluated individually and in combination for the suppression of fire blight of pear or apple in 10 field trials inoculated with the pathogen Erwinia amylovora. The formulation of pathogen inoculum applied to blossoms influenced establishment of the pathogen and the efficacy of biological control. Pantoea vagans C9-1 suppressed fire blight in all five trials in which the pathogen was applied as lyophilized cells but in none of the trials in which the pathogen was applied as freshly harvested cells. In contrast, Pseudomonas fluorescens A506 reduced disease significantly in only one trial. A mixture of the two strains also suppressed fire blight, but the magnitude of disease suppression over all field trials (averaging 32%) was less than that attained by C9-1 alone (42%). The two biological control agents did not antagonize one another on blossom surfaces, and application of the mixture of A506 and C9-1 to blossoms resulted in a greater proportion of flowers having detectable populations of at least one bacterial antagonist than the application of individual strains. Therefore, the mixture of A506 and C9-1 provided less disease control than expected based upon the epiphytic population sizes of the antagonists on blossom surfaces. We speculate that the biocontrol mixture was less effective than anticipated due to incompatibility between the mechanisms by which A506 and C9-1 suppress disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stockwell et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6336f2f2b26b0647095d35https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-03-10-0097
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mechanistically Compatible Mixtures of Bacterial Antagonists Improve Biological Control of Fire Blight of Pear2010 · 134 citations
  2. 2Biological Control Agents for Fire Blight of Apple Compared Under Conditions Limiting Natural Dispersal2002 · 83 citations
  3. 3Secondary Colonization of Pear Blossoms by Two Bacterial Antagonists of the Fire Blight Pathogen1998 · 58 citations
  4. 4An Extracellular Protease of Pseudomonas fluorescens Inactivates Antibiotics of Pantoea agglomerans2004 · 44 citations
  5. 5Interactions of Antibiotics withPseudomonas fluorescensStrain A506 in the Control of Fire Blight and Frost Injury to Pear1996 · 113 citations