PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 13, 2021Magnetic Resonance in Medicine36 citationsOpen Access

Scout accelerated motion estimation and reduction (SAMER)

View Full Paper
DPDaniel PolakDSDaniel Nicolas SplitthoffBCBryan Clifford

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate a navigator/tracking-free retrospective motion estimation technique that facilitates clinically acceptable reconstruction time. METHODS: Scout accelerated motion estimation and reduction (SAMER) uses a single 3-5 s, low-resolution scout scan and a novel sequence reordering to independently determine motion states by minimizing the data-consistency error in a SENSE plus motion forward model. This eliminates time-consuming alternating optimization as no updates to the imaging volume are required during the motion estimation. The SAMER approach was assessed quantitatively through extensive simulation and was evaluated in vivo across multiple motion scenarios and clinical imaging contrasts. Finally, SAMER was synergistically combined with advanced encoding (Wave-CAIPI) to facilitate rapid motion-free imaging. RESULTS: The highly accelerated scout provided sufficient information to achieve accurate motion trajectory estimation (accuracy ~0.2 mm or degrees). The novel sequence reordering improved the stability of the motion parameter estimation and image reconstruction while preserving the clinical imaging contrast. Clinically acceptable computation times for the motion estimation (~4 s/shot) are demonstrated through a fully separable (non-alternating) motion search across the shots. Substantial artifact reduction was demonstrated in vivo as well as corresponding improvement in the quantitative error metric. Finally, the extension of SAMER to Wave-encoding enabled rapid high-quality imaging at up to R = 9-fold acceleration. CONCLUSION: SAMER significantly improved the computational scalability for retrospective motion estimation and correction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Polak et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a638ca39a2e487662c20792https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28971
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TArgeted Motion Estimation and Reduction (TAMER): Data Consistency Based Motion Mitigation for MRI Using a Reduced Model Joint Optimization2018 · 68 citations
  2. 2A 1‐minute full brain MR exam using a multicontrast EPI sequence2017 · 72 citations
  3. 3Correction of periodic motion artifacts along the slice selection axis in MRI1990 · 31 citations
  4. 4Automatic correction of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images using an entropy focus criterion1997 · 305 citations
  5. 5FLASH: clinical three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.1988 · 24 citations