PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 21, 2024Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis15 citationsOpen Access

Criteria for Identifying Candidates for Systemic Psoriasis Treatment in the Real World: Application of the International Psoriasis Council Guidelines in Patients in North America

BSBruce StroberYZYichen ZhongAŠAdam Šíma

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: The International Psoriasis Council (IPC) updated the classification of psoriasis severity to guide clinical decision-making. According to IPC guidelines, patients are considered candidates for systemic therapy when body surface area (BSA) is >10%, when lesions affect special body areas (ie, face, palms, soles, genitals, scalp, or nails), or when topical therapy fails to control symptoms. Objective: To evaluate patient candidacy for systemic therapy in real-world settings, according to disease severity criteria. Methods: This cross-sectional study included systemic treatment-naive patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry who initiated systemic treatment at Registry visits between April 2015 and April 2023. Based on IPC criteria, systemic therapy candidates were identified, and data on demographics and clinical characteristics, including disease severity indicators (ie, BSA and Psoriasis Area Severity Index PASI scores) and patient-reported outcome measures, were collected and descriptively summarized. Results: The analysis included 2739 systemic therapy initiators with plaque psoriasis, of whom 82.7% met IPC criteria for systemic therapy. Of the 2265 systemic therapy candidates, 56.2% had a BSA >10%, 53.2% had a history of psoriasis affecting special areas, and 55.2% had prior but not current use of topical therapy. Notably, 71.0% of candidates for systemic therapy had PASI scores ≤12. Conclusion: In this large real-world study, most patients with psoriasis who initiated systemic therapy met the IPC disease severity criteria to do so. Disease severity categorization based on PASI scores and BSA percentage alone may not adequately capture all patients who might be candidates for systemic psoriasis treatment. Clinicaltrialsgov: NCT02707341.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Strober et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a63b1504f5ef41b946af05ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/24755303241302070
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Undertreatment, Treatment Trends, and Treatment Dissatisfaction Among Patients With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in the United States2013 · 392 citations
  2. 2Long‐term, durable, absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and health‐related quality of life improvements with risankizumab treatment: a post hoc integrated analysis of patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis2022 · 23 citations
  3. 3Current severe psoriasis and the Rule of Tens2005 · 397 citations
  4. 4Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI): Why do both? A systematic analysis of randomized controlled trials of biologic agents for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis2011 · 201 citations
  5. 5The efficacy and safety of apremilast, etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis: 52‐week results from a phase IIIb, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (LIBERATE)2016 · 201 citations