PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2012European Journal of Neuroscience171 citationsOpen Access

Exploration and modulation of brain network interactions with noninvasive brain stimulation in combination with neuroimaging

View Full Paper
MSMouhsin M. ShafiBerenson Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain StimulationMWM. Brandon WestoverBroad InstituteMFMichael FoxBrigham and Women's Hospital

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Much recent work in systems neuroscience has focused on how dynamic interactions between different cortical regions underlie complex brain functions such as motor coordination, language and emotional regulation. Various studies using neuroimaging and neurophysiologic techniques have suggested that in many neuropsychiatric disorders, these dynamic brain networks are dysregulated. Here we review the utility of combined noninvasive brain stimulation and neuroimaging approaches towards greater understanding of dynamic brain networks in health and disease. Brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, use electromagnetic principles to alter brain activity noninvasively, and induce focal but also network effects beyond the stimulation site. When combined with brain imaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography and electroencephalography, these brain stimulation techniques enable a causal assessment of the interaction between different network components, and their respective functional roles. The same techniques can also be applied to explore hypotheses regarding the changes in functional connectivity that occur during task performance and in various disease states such as stroke, depression and schizophrenia. Finally, in diseases characterized by pathologic alterations in either the excitability within a single region or in the activity of distributed networks, such techniques provide a potential mechanism to alter cortical network function and architectures in a beneficial manner.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shafi et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a63e44694d8bae735b3731bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08035.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Positron Emission Tomography: A New Method for Studying Connectivity of the Human Cerebral Cortex1997 · 702 citations
  2. 2Multimodal characterization of population responses evoked by applied electric field in vitro: extracellular potential, magnetic evoked field, transmembrane potential, and current-source density analysis1991 · 34 citations
  3. 3Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets1993 · 2,018 citations
  4. 4Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: Facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee1986 · 312 citations
  5. 5Long-lasting Changes in the Level of the Electrical Activity of the Cerebral Cortex produced by Polarizing Currents1962 · 317 citations