PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 3, 2011Journal of Burn Care & Research323 citations

Epidemiology and Impact of Scarring After Burn Injury

View Full Paper
JLJohn LawrenceSMShawn T. MasonKSKatherine Schomer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the existing literature on the incidence of hypertrophic scarring and the psychosocial impact of burn scars. In a comprehensive literature review, the authors identified 48 articles published since 1965 and written in English which reported the incidence and risk factors for hypertrophic scarring or assessed outcomes related to scarring. Most studies had important methodological limitations limiting the generalizability of the findings. In particular, the absence of standardized valid measures of scarring and other outcome variables was a major barrier to drawing strong conclusions. Among studies on hypertrophic scarring, the prevalence rate varied between 32 and 72%. Identified risk factors included dark skin, female gender, young age, burn site on neck and upper limb, multiple surgical procedures, meshed skin graph, time to healing, and burn severity. With regard to psychosocial outcomes, two studies compared pediatric burn survivors with a nonburn comparison group on a body image measure; neither study found differences between groups. Across studies, burn severity and location had a modest relationship with psychosocial outcome variables. Psychosocial variables such as social comfort and perceived stigmatization were more highly associated with body image than burn characteristics. To advance our knowledge of the epidemiology of scars and the burden of scars, future studies need to implement more rigorous methodologies. In particular, standardized valid measures of scarring and other outcomes should be developed. This process could be facilitated by an international collaboration among burn centers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lawrence et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a63eab9b5b214049b7a7ac7https://doi.org/10.1097/bcr.0b013e3182374452
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: A systematic review of the empirical literature2007 · 118 citations
  2. 2Psychological morbidity in patients with facial and neck burns1998 · 63 citations
  3. 3“Understanding burns”: Research project BurnCase 3D—Overcome the limits of existing methods in burns documentation2008 · 49 citations
  4. 4Hypertrophic burn scars: analysis of variables.1983 · 560 citations
  5. 5The Child and His Family at Home: What Then?1977 · 2 citations