PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2016ACS Catalysis139 citations

Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution with an Atomically Precise Nickel Catalyst

View Full Paper
DKDouglas R. KauffmanDADominic AlfonsoDTDe Nyago Tafen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is an important anodic process in water splitting and CO 2 reduction applications. Precious metals including Ir, Ru. and Pt are traditional OER catalysts, but recent emphasis has been placed on finding less expensive, earth-abundant materials with high OER activity. Ni-based materials are promising next-generation OER catalysts because they show high reaction rates and good long-term stability. Unfortunately, most catalyst samples contain heterogeneous particle sizes and surface structures that produce a range of reaction rates and rate-determining steps. Here we use a combination of experimental and computational techniques to study the OER at a supported organometallic nickel complex with a precisely known crystal structure. The Ni 6 (PET) 12 (PET = phenylethyl thiol) complex out performed bulk NiO and Pt and showed OER activity comparable to Ir. Density functional theory (DFT) analysis of electrochemical OER at a realistic Ni 6 (SCH 3 ) 12 model determined the Gibbs free energy change (Δ G ) associated with each mechanistic step. This allowed computational prediction of potential determining steps and OER onset potentials that were in excellent agreement with experimentally determined values. Moreover, DFT found that small changes in adsorbate binding configuration can shift the potential determining step within the OER mechanism and drastically change onset potentials. Our work shows that atomically precise nanocatalysts like Ni 6 (PET) 12 facilitate joint experimental and computational studies because experimentalists and theorists can study nearly identical systems. These types of efforts can identify atomic-level structure–property relationships that would be difficult to obtain with traditional heterogeneous catalyst samples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kauffman et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a63f8435e88ba7aa33867d5https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b02633
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Structure of a Toroidal, Neutral, Homoleptic Ni(II) Complex with a Chelate Dithiolate Ligand, [Ni6(SCH2CH2CH2S)6].1994 · 21 citations
  2. 2Voltammetry at Nanoparticle and Microparticle Modified Electrodes: Theory and Experiment2007 · 83 citations
  3. 3Oxygen Evolution at Platinum Electrodes in Alkaline Solutions: II . Mechanism of the Reaction1986 · 81 citations
  4. 4A general purpose sub-keV X-ray facility at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory1990 · 55 citations
  5. 5Highly Active Mixed-Metal Nanosheet Water Oxidation Catalysts Made by Pulsed-Laser Ablation in Liquids2014 · 320 citations