PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2004American Journal of Hypertension216 citations

Relationship between central sympathetic activity and stages of human hypertension

View Full Paper
PSPeter G. Smith

Key Result

Central sympathetic frequency was significantly higher in borderline (75 impulses/100 beats) and stage 1 essential hypertension (76) compared to normal blood pressure (33) (P<0.01).

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=90)

Structured PICO

How does central sympathetic nerve activity vary across different stages of human hypertension, including borderline and white-coat hypertension?

P
Population
90 untreated subjects categorized into matched groups of normal blood pressure and various stages of hypertension.
O
Outcome
Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) quantified as mean frequency of multiunit discharge and single-units (s-MSNA)surrogate

Central sympathetic hyperactivity is most pronounced in borderline, early-stage, and complicated essential hypertension, suggesting an integral role in hypertension development and complications.

Main Result

p-value: p=<.01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The magnitude of sympathetic hyperactivity in essential hypertension (EHT) varies with its severity and complications. There are no data on sympathetic nerve activity in borderline (BHT) or white-coat hypertension (WHT) relative to the various stages of EHT, despite suggestions that both lead to established EHT and organ damage through sympathetic mechanisms. We planned to determine the magnitude of sympathetic nerve activity in patients with BHT and WHT in relation to normality and various stages of sustained EHT. METHODS: We examined 90 untreated subjects comprising matched groups with BHT (n = 13), WHT (n = 12), Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure EHT stage 1 (EHT-1 n = 12), EHT stages 2 and 3 (EHT-2/3 n = 14), high-normal pressure (HN n = 14), and normal pressure (NT n = 13), as well as a group with EHT complicated by left ventricular hypertrophy (EHT+LVH n = 12). We quantified muscle sympathetic nerve activity as the mean frequency of multiunit discharge (MSNA) and that of single-units (s-MSNA). RESULTS: We found a greater (at least P <.01) mean central sympathetic frequency in BHT (75 +/- 5.8 impulses/100 beats), EHT-1 (76 +/- 4.0 impulses/100 beats), and EHT+LVH (79 +/- 4.3 impulses/100 beats) than in EHT-2/3 (57 +/- 3.1 impulses/100 beats), WHT (52 +/- 3.6 impulses/100 beats), HN (42 +/- 3.9 impulses/100 beats), and NT (33 +/- 3.6 impulses/100 beats). BHT hyperactivity was closer to that of EHT, whereas WHT was closer to NT. CONCLUSIONS: Central sympathetic activity was greatest in BHT, early stage, and complicated EHT, and as such is likely to play an integral role in the development of hypertension and its complications. Sympathetic hyperactivity occurs in WHT, but to a lesser extent than in BHT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peter G. Smith (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=90). Hypertension stage vs. Normal blood pressure was evaluated on Mean central sympathetic frequency (impulses/100 beats) (p=<.01). Central sympathetic frequency was significantly higher in borderline (75 impulses/100 beats) and stage 1 essential hypertension (76) compared to normal blood pressure (33) (P<0.01).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a64aea2740c57b0d0f00f32https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.10.010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper