PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 25, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology75 citations

Electrocardiographic Comparison of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Tachycardia

View Full Paper
KHKurt S. HoffmayerOMOrlando N. MachadoGMGregory M. Marcus

Key Result

A QRS duration in lead I of ≥120 ms strongly predicted the presence of ARVD/C compared to RVOT-VT (OR 20.4, p=0.034).

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare electrocardiographic characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias in two heart conditions: arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia.
  • Comparative analysis of electrocardiograms from patients diagnosed with both conditions.
  • Analysis focused on identifying different types of ventricular arrhythmias.
  • Included clinical assessment and interpretation of findings.
  • Identified significant differences in the electrocardiographic patterns of ventricular arrhythmias between both patient groups.
  • Patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy exhibited distinct arrhythmic characteristics.
  • Findings may aid in improved differentiation and management of the two conditions.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=58)

PICO

P
Population
58 patients with ventricular tachycardia or premature ventricular contractions with left bundle branch block/inferior axis pattern, including patients with ARVD/C and RVOT-VT.
E
Exposure / Comparator
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) vs Right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia (RVOT-VT)
O
Primary Outcome
Prediction of ARVD/C by QRS duration in lead I of ≥120 ms — OR 20.4, p=0.034

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 20.4

p-value: p=0.034

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether electrocardiographic characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias distinguish patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) from those with right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia (RVOT-VT). BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias in RVOT-VT and ARVD/C-VT patients can share a left bundle branch block/inferior axis morphology. METHODS: We compared the electrocardiographic morphology of ventricular tachycardia or premature ventricular contractions with left bundle branch block/inferior axis pattern in 16 ARVD/C patients with that in 42 RVOT-VT patients. RESULTS: ARVD/C patients had a significantly longer mean QRS duration in lead I (150 ± 31 ms vs. 123 ± 34 ms, p = 0.006), more often exhibited a precordial transition in lead V(6) (3 of 17 18% vs. 0 of 42 0% with RVOT-VT, p = 0.005), and more often had at least 1 lead with notching (11 of 17 65% vs. 9 of 42 21%, p = 0.001). The most sensitive characteristics for the detection of ARVD/C were a QRS duration in lead I of ≥120 ms (88% sensitivity, 91% negative predictive value). QRS transition at V(6) was most specific at 100% (100% positive predictive value, 77% negative predictive value). The presence of notching on any QRS complex had 79% sensitivity and 65% specificity of (55% positive predictive value, 85% negative predictive value). In multivariate analysis, QRS duration in lead I of ≥120 ms (odds ratio OR: 20.4, p = 0.034), earliest onset QRS in lead V(1) (OR: 17.0, p = 0.022), QRS notching (OR: 7.7, p = 0.018), and a transition of V(5) or later (OR: 7.0, p = 0.030) each predicted the presence of ARVD/C. CONCLUSIONS: Several electrocardiographic criteria can help distinguish right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias originating from ARVD/C compared with RVOT-VT patients.

Expert Takes1 quote

“In fact in our series not a single ARVD/C patient had epsilon waves”

Kurt S. Hoffmayer, Cardiac electrophysiologist, University of California San FranciscoUniversity of California, San Franciscoauto_pipelineNeutralView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoffmayer et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) and right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia (RVOT-VT) (n=58). Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) vs. Right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia (RVOT-VT) was evaluated on Prediction of ARVD/C by QRS duration in lead I of ≥120 ms (OR 20.4, p=0.034). A QRS duration in lead I of ≥120 ms strongly predicted the presence of ARVD/C compared to RVOT-VT (OR 20.4, p=0.034).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a65284d26fca1f290a7e437https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Usefulness of Precordial T-Wave Inversion to Distinguish Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy from Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia Arising from the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract2010 · 38 citations
  2. 2Relaxing the Rule of Ten Events per Variable in Logistic and Cox Regression2006 · 4,311 citations
  3. 3The 1998 NASPE Prospective Catheter Ablation Registry2000 · 373 citations
  4. 4Evidence-Based Diagnosis2009 · 94 citations
  5. 5Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia2010 · 2,677 citations