PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 26, 2026Algorithms0 citationsOpen Access

Research on Company Financial Risk Early Warnings Based on FA-LSTFormer Model

MCMiao ChengNWNing Wu

Key Points

  • The study aims to improve early warning of financial risks by addressing class imbalance and model interpretability.
  • Developed the FA-LSTFormer classification model utilizing LSTM and Transformer architectures.
  • Incorporated a Risk-Sensitive Hierarchical Indicator Attention (RSHA) module for detailed analysis.
  • Employed a Class-Imbalance-Aware Focal Loss (CIFL) function to better identify high-risk samples.
  • FA-LSTFormer achieved an accuracy rate of 92.76%, outperforming LTR-Net by 1.64–3.60% across key metrics.
  • Increased AUC to 95.27%, demonstrating strong predictive performance for high-risk warnings.
  • Maintained an accuracy of 84.46% over three years with a low error rate of 9.82% in risk evaluation.

Abstract

Timely identification of company financial risks is crucial for investors and regulators. However, existing studies overlook the class imbalance caused by the scarcity of high-risk samples, and the interpretability of deep models is insufficient, making it difficult to meet the practical needs. To address these problems, we propose a classification model named FA-LSTFormer, which models a company’s financial risk as low-, medium- and high-warning tasks. FA-LSTFormer employs LSTM and Transformer to decouple the short-term continuity and long-term dependency inherent in financial data. To further attend to indicator-level nuances, we incorporate a Risk-Sensitive Hierarchical Indicator Attention (RSHA) module. Moreover, given the pronounced class imbalance where high-risk events are substantially underrepresented, we further propose a Class-Imbalance-Aware Focal Loss (CIFL) function to prioritize these minor yet critical samples and suppress false negatives. On the dataset of Chinese A-share manufacturing listed companies, experimental results show that our FA-LSTFormer achieves superior performance in accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and AUC, achieving 92.76%, 93.13%, 91.84%, 92.48%, and 95.27%, respectively. Compared to the suboptimal LTR-Net, it improves these metrics by 1.64–3.60%. Compared to the LSTM–Transformer baseline, FA-LSTFormer improves on it by 4.30–9.13%. In the risk-oriented decision evaluation, FA-LSTFormer achieves a warning ROC of 0.954 for the high-risk class and lowers the error rate to 9.82%. It maintains an accuracy rate of 84.46% even after three years of early warning and exhibits strong robustness across different warning thresholds and company sizes. These results verify the advantages of FA-LSTFormer in both algorithmic performance and practical early-warning applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a65a660d3aea3239cd77c50https://doi.org/10.3390/a19080610
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper