PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 26, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Dynamic proprioceptive training improves functional recovery in sprinters with patellofemoral pain: A randomized trial

View Full Paper
DBDevadharshini BSSShenbaga Sundaram SubramanianJTJeevarathinam Thirumalai

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the effects of dynamic proprioceptive training and conventional strengthening on functional recovery in sprinters with PFPS.
  • Assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial with 60 recreational sprinters suffering from unilateral PFPS.
  • Participants assigned to Dynamic Proprioceptive Training or Strengthening Program, receiving rehabilitation three times weekly for 12 weeks.
  • Primary outcomes measured included pain intensity, dynamic balance, and single-hop distance at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks.
  • DPT group showed greater reduction in pain (MD = 1.01 NPRS points, 95% CI: 0.61–1.41) compared to SP group at 12 weeks.
  • DPT group had significant improvements in dynamic balance (MD = 5.73 cm, 95% CI: 4.31–7.15) and hop performance (MD = 35.84 mm, 95% CI: 16.84–54.85).
  • Both groups improved significantly (p < 0.001), but DPT demonstrated clinically meaningful advantages.

Abstract

Background Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common musculoskeletal condition among physically active individuals, particularly sprinters, and is frequently associated with pain, impaired balance, and reduced functional performance. This study compared the effects of dynamic proprioceptive training and conventional strengthening on multidomain functional recovery in recreational sprinters with PFPS. Methods A two-arm, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted among 60 recreational sprinters with unilateral PFPS. Participants were randomly allocated to either a Dynamic Proprioceptive Training (DPT) group or a Strengthening Program (SP) group (n = 30 each). Both groups received supervised rehabilitation three times weekly for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes included pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale NPRS), dynamic balance (Y-Balance Test YBT), and single-hop distance. Secondary outcomes included limb symmetry index (LSI), recovery rates, and a composite Recovery Efficiency Index (REI). Assessments were performed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Repeated-measures ANOVA and regression-based analyses were performed. This trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2025/07/090253). Results Both groups improved significantly over time (p < 0.001). However, the DPT group demonstrated greater clinically meaningful improvements than the SP group. At 12 weeks, between-group differences favored DPT for pain reduction (MD = 1.01 NPRS points, 95% CI: 0.61–1.41), dynamic balance (MD = 5.73 cm, 95% CI: 4.31–7.15), and hop performance (MD = 35.84 mm, 95% CI: 16.84–54.85). Conclusion Dynamic proprioceptive training produced greater multidomain functional recovery than conventional strengthening in recreational sprinters with PFPS. Incorporating sensorimotor and perturbation-based exercises into rehabilitation programmes may improve functional recovery, limb symmetry, and sport-specific performance in athletic populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

B et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a65a6b5d3aea3239cd77ec8https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper