PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 26, 2026Higher Education0 citationsOpen Access

Transnational intersectionality: Legal, racial, and national dimensions of institutional marginalization for chinese international students

JHJinke HeJYJing Yu

Key Points

  • This study aims to examine how legal, racial, and national dimensions contribute to the marginalization of Chinese international students in U.S. higher education.
  • Adopts a transnationalism framework to develop an identity-based model of exclusion.
  • Uses Critical Interpretive Synthesis to analyze 58 sources, including federal legal texts and policy discourse.
  • Explains the intersections of legal noncitizenship, racialization, and national identity in creating multi-axis vulnerability.
  • Identifies a state of 'citizenship limbo' impacting legal rights and social welfare access for Chinese international students.
  • The findings reveal that institutional mechanisms of exclusion significantly shape the experience of legal noncitizenship and racialized visibility.
  • Suggests the need for universities to expand legal support and address embedded biases in administrative practices.

Abstract

Abstract Despite constituting a major population in U.S. higher education, Chinese international students experience institutional marginalization that is often obscured by individual-level deficit narratives. This study adopts transnationalism as an analytic frame to develop an identity-based model, specifying how legal noncitizenship, racialization, and national identity function as institutional mechanisms of exclusion across transnational contexts. It employs Critical Interpretive Synthesis to integrate federal legal and regulatory texts, policy discourse, and a corpus of 58 sources across empirical scholarship, explaining how these dimensions intersect through institutional pathways to co-produce multi-axis vulnerability. The findings theorize a state of “citizenship limbo,” marked by a conditional rights regime and legal exclusion from social welfare supports. From a transnational intersectionality perspective, Chinese international students’ institutional positioning is shaped by the convergence of legal noncitizenship, racialized visibility, and neo-nationalist national interest logics. These dimensions intersect through racialized constructions of national interest and nationality-linked administrative protocols, producing instability and precarity for Chinese international students. The paper concludes with implications for universities, including the expansion of legal support capacity, strengthened institutional safety nets, and efforts to address bias embedded in academic and administrative practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

He et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a65a6f2d3aea3239cd77f50https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-026-01735-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper