PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2024Obesity Reviews53 citationsOpen Access

Anti‐obesity pharmacological agents for polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis to inform the 2023 international evidence‐based guideline

View Full Paper
AGAlyse S. GoldbergSGSandro GracaJLJing Liu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Summary This systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluated the efficacy of anti‐obesity agents for hormonal, reproductive, metabolic, and psychological outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to inform the 2023 update of the International Evidence‐based Guideline on PCOS. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL until July 2022 with a 10‐year limit to focus on newer agents. Eleven trials (545 and 451 participants in intervention and control arms respectively, 12 comparisons) were included. On descriptive analyses, most agents improved anthropometric outcomes; liraglutide, semaglutide and orlistat appeared superior to placebo for anthropometric outcomes. Meta‐analyses were possible for two comparisons (exenatide vs. metformin and orlistat + combined oral contraceptive pill COCP vs. COCP alone). On meta‐analysis, no differences were identified between exenatide versus metformin for anthropometric, biochemical hyperandrogenism, and metabolic outcomes, other than lower fasting blood glucose more with metformin than exenatide (MD: 0.10 mmol/L, CI 0.02–0.17, I 2 = 18%, 2 trials). Orlistat + COCP did not improve metabolic outcomes compared with COCP alone (fasting insulin MD: −8.65 pmol/L, −33.55 to 16.26, I 2 = 67%, 2 trials). Published data examining the effects of anti‐obesity agents in women with PCOS are very limited. The role of these agents in PCOS should be a high priority for future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Goldberg et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6998d957d7d08ca7e838dehttps://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13704
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper