PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 21, 2024Rare Metals74 citations

Recent progress and strategies of cathodes toward polysulfides shuttle restriction for lithium‐sulfur batteries

View Full Paper
XRXingyou RaoSXShuangfei XiangJZJian Zhou

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Lithium‐sulfur batteries (LSBs) have already developed into one of the most promising new‐generation high‐energy density electrochemical energy storage systems with outstanding features including high‐energy density, low cost, and environmental friendliness. However, the development and commercialization path of LSBs still presents significant limitations and challenges, particularly the notorious shuttle effect triggered by soluble long‐chain lithium polysulfides (LiPSs), which inevitably leads to low utilization of cathode active sulfur and high battery capacity degradation, short cycle life, etc. Substantial research efforts have been conducted to develop various sulfur host materials capable of effectively restricting the shuttle effect. This review firstly introduces the fundamental electrochemical aspects of LSBs, followed by a comprehensive analysis of the mechanism underlying the shuttle effect in Li–S batteries and its profound influence on various battery components as well as the overall battery performance. Subsequently, recent advances and strategies are systematically reviewed, including physical confinement, chemisorption, and catalytic conversion of sulfur hosts for restricting LiPSs shuttle effects. The interplay mechanisms of sulfur hosts and LiPSs are discussed in detail and the structural advantages of different host materials are highlighted. Furthermore, key insights for the rational design of advanced host materials for LSBs are provided, and the upcoming challenges and the prospects for sulfur host materials in lithium‐sulfur batteries are also explored.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rao et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a69e0aafbc1e328e8440b57https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-024-02708-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Lithium/Sulfur Rechargeable Cell2002 · 477 citations
  2. 2Status and prospects in sulfur–carbon composites as cathode materials for rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries2015 · 430 citations
  3. 3Sulfur Redox Reactions at Working Interfaces in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: A Perspective2019 · 208 citations
  4. 4Engineering d‐p Orbital Hybridization in Single‐Atom Metal‐Embedded Three‐Dimensional Electrodes for Li–S Batteries2021 · 427 citations
  5. 5Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Cathodes with High Compatibility in Both Ether and Carbonate Electrolytes for Ultrastable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries2019 · 280 citations