PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2003AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology51 citations

Assessment of spatial inhomogeneities in intima media thickness along an arterial segment using its dynamic behavior

View Full Paper
JMJan M. MeindersLKLilian KornetAHArnold P.G. Hoeks

Key Result

Spatial inhomogeneities in the change in intima media thickness during the cardiac cycle were detected in 22 of 47 presumed healthy subjects (P<0.05), with differing local compression patterns by age.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=47)

Structured PICO

P
Population
47 presumed healthy subjects aged 21 to 75 years underwent assessment of spatial inhomogeneities in carotid intima media thickness.
E
Exposure
Measurement of spatial variance in end-diastolic intima media thickness (IMT) and change in IMT during the cardiac cycle (DeltaIMT) at 16 positions simultaneously along a 15.86 mm segment of the common carotid artery
O
Outcome
Spatial inhomogeneities in IMT and DeltaIMTsurrogate

A novel method assessing spatial inhomogeneities in carotid artery IMT dynamics reveals age-related differences in local arterial wall compression.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

To assess locally deviating structural and mechanical properties of arterial walls, the spatial variance in end-diastolic intima media thickness (IMT) and the change in IMT during the cardiac cycle (DeltaIMT) were determined along a short segment of the common carotid artery (15.86 mm), at 16 positions simultaneously. Intrasubject spatial inhomogeneities along the artery were revealed by a spatial variance significantly larger than the temporal variance over several beats. If differences between positions were confirmed, the extent of the inhomogeneity was obtained by comparison of IMT and DeltaIMT at each position with their spatial medians +/- the least-significant difference. Because no intersubject comparisons were necessary, a single session of several measurements was sufficient to assess inhomogeneities in the arterial wall properties of a subject, making the method independent of biological variability between subjects. The method was evaluated on 47 presumed healthy subjects (age range 21-75 yr). In 22 subjects, spatial inhomogeneities in DeltaIMT occurred (P < 0.05). In young subjects, DeltaIMT was locally decreased, i.e., in systole inhomogeneities were less compressed than their surrounding tissue. In older subjects, DeltaIMT was locally increased, i.e., the inhomogeneity was locally more compressed than its surrounding wall tissue.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meinders et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Presumed healthy (n=47). Assessment of spatial inhomogeneities in IMT and DeltaIMT was evaluated on Spatial inhomogeneities in DeltaIMT (p=<0.05). Spatial inhomogeneities in the change in intima media thickness during the cardiac cycle were detected in 22 of 47 presumed healthy subjects (P<0.05), with differing local compression patterns by age.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a69e2f2ba61fbfa0247fa9chttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00729.2002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper