PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 7, 2012Journal of Clinical Oncology218 citations

Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials for the Incidence and Risk of Treatment-Related Mortality in Patients With Cancer Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

View Full Paper
FSFabio A.B. SchutzYJYoujin JeCRChristopher J. Richards

Key Result

Treatment with VEGFR TKIs in patients with cancer significantly increased the risk of fatal adverse events compared with control (RR 2.23; 95% CI 1.12-4.44; P=0.023).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=4,679)

Structured PICO

Does VEGFR TKI therapy increase the risk of fatal adverse events in patients with cancer?

P
Population
4,679 patients with cancer from 10 randomized controlled trials evaluating FDA-approved VEGFR TKIs.
I
Intervention
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (pazopanib, sunitinib, and sorafenib)
C
Comparator
Control patients
O
Outcome
Fatal adverse events (FAEs)safety

The use of VEGFR TKIs in cancer patients is associated with a more than twofold increased risk of fatal adverse events compared to control.

Main Result

Relative Risk: 2.23 (95% CI 1.12–4.44)

p-value: p=0.023

Abstract

PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the cornerstone in the treatment of several malignancies. These drugs have also been associated with an increase in the risk of potentially life-threatening adverse events, such as arterial thrombotic events, bleeding, congestive heart failure, and others. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs) in patients with cancer treated with VEGFR TKIs. METHODS: MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for articles published from January 1966 to February 2011. Eligible studies were limited to trials of US Food and Drug Administration-approved VEGFR TKIs (pazopanib, sunitinib, and sorafenib) that reported on patients with cancer with any primary tumor type, randomized design, and adequate safety profile. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, relative risk (RR), and 95% CIs by using random-effects or fixed-effects models on the basis of the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: In all, 4,679 patients from 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, with 2,856 from sorafenib, 1,388 from sunitinib, and 435 from pazopanib trials. The incidence of FAEs related to VEGFR TKIs was 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8% to 2.4%) with an RR of 2.23 (95% CI, 1.12 to 4.44; P = .023) compared with control patients. On subgroup analysis, no difference in the rate of FAEs was found between different VEGFR TKIs or tumor types. No evidence of publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: In a meta-analysis of RCTs, the use of VEGFR TKIs was associated with an increased risk of FAEs compared with control patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schutz et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Cancer (n=4,679). VEGFR TKIs (pazopanib, sunitinib, and sorafenib) vs. Control was evaluated on Fatal adverse events (FAEs) (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.12 to 4.44, p=0.023). Treatment with VEGFR TKIs in patients with cancer significantly increased the risk of fatal adverse events compared with control (RR 2.23; 95% CI 1.12-4.44; P=0.023).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6a78463e46b6df0af2c00fhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.37.1195
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper