PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2003The Humanistic Psychologist157 citations

To not make definite what is indefinite: A phenomenological analysis of perception and its epistemological consequences in human science research.

View Full Paper
HDHelena DahlbergKDKarin Dahlberg

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the basics of human science, namely within the understanding of perception, which in fact is about how we as humans are in relationship to the world. There are several philosophical and psychological traditions trying to explain the nature of perception, the perceived, and the role of the perceiver. An idea that we argue against is that perception is about a changing subject perceiving a constant world, which means that there is a sharp dividing line between subject and object. Instead we argue that subject and object make up a dynamic relationship.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dahlberg et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6b387efd493d2318f4271bhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2003.9986933
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper