PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 29, 2002Circulation123 citationsOpen Access

Improved Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation After Blockade of Endothelin Receptors in Patients With Essential Hypertension

View Full Paper
CCCarmine CardilloUCUmberto CampiaCKCrescence M. Kilcoyne

Key Result

Combined ET(A/B) receptor blockade significantly potentiated the endothelium-dependent vasodilator response to acetylcholine in hypertensive patients compared with saline (P=0.01).

Structured PICO

Does combined ET(A) and ET(B) receptor blockade improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with essential hypertension?

P
Population
Hypertensive patients and healthy controls undergoing assessment of forearm blood flow responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside before and after ET-1 receptor blockade.
I
Intervention
Nonselective blockade of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors by combined intraarterial infusion of BQ-123 (100 nmol/min) and BQ-788 (50 nmol/min)
C
Comparator
Saline administration (baseline) and healthy control subjects
O
Outcome
Forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to intraarterial infusion of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside assessed by strain-gauge plethysmographysurrogate

Blockade of endothelin receptors improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with essential hypertension, suggesting increased ET-1 activity contributes to endothelial dysfunction in this population.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive patients have both impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation and increased activity of the endothelin (ET-1) system, which participate in their increased vascular tone and may predispose them to atherosclerosis. This study investigated the contribution of increased ET-1 activity to the impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilator function of hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to intraarterial infusion of acetylcholine (ACh; 7.5, 15, and 30 microg/min) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 0.8,1.6, and 3.2 microg/min) were assessed by strain-gauge plethysmography before and after nonselective blockade of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors by combined infusion of BQ-123 (ET(A) blocker; 100 nmol/min) and BQ-788 (ET(B) blocker; 50 nmol/min). During saline administration, the vasodilator response to ACh was significantly blunted in hypertensive patients compared with controls (P<0.001), whereas the vasodilator effect of SNP was not different between groups (P=0.74). Blockade of ET-1 receptors resulted in a significant increase in FBF from baseline in hypertensive patients (P<0.008) but not in controls (P=0.15). In hypertensive patients, a combined ET(A/B) blockade resulted in a significant potentiation of the vasodilator response to ACh compared with saline (P=0.01), whereas the response to SNP was unchanged (P=0.44). In contrast, the response to ACh was not significantly modified by ET-1 receptor antagonism in healthy subjects (P=0.14 compared with saline). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that blockade of ET-1 receptors improves endothelium-dependent vasodilator function in hypertensive patients, thereby suggesting that an increased ET-1 activity may play a role in the pathophysiology of this abnormality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cardillo et al. (2002) studied Essential Hypertension. Combined ET(A) and ET(B) receptor blockade (BQ-123 and BQ-788) vs. Saline administration was evaluated on Forearm blood flow (FBF) response to intraarterial infusion of acetylcholine (ACh) (p=0.01). Combined ET(A/B) receptor blockade significantly potentiated the endothelium-dependent vasodilator response to acetylcholine in hypertensive patients compared with saline (P=0.01).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6bef221e51ef7293b3e530https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0402.102989
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper