PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2010Scandinavian Journal of Public Health105 citations

Does a variation in self-reported physical activity reflect variation in objectively measured physical activity, resting heart rate, and physical fitness? Results from the Tromsø study

View Full Paper
AEAina EmausJDJorid DegerstrømTWTom Wilsgaard

Key Result

Self-reported leisure physical activity correlated moderately with objectively measured overall physical activity (ICC 0.62 for women and 0.59 for men) and physical fitness.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=10,624)

Structured PICO

Does self-reported physical activity accurately reflect objectively measured physical activity, resting heart rate, and physical fitness in adults?

P
Population
10,624 men and women aged 30-69 years attending the sixth survey of the Tromsø study, with a sub-study of 313 healthy individuals aged 40-44 years.
E
Exposure
Self-reported physical activity assessment (Tromsø physical activity questionnaire)
C
Comparator
Objectively measured physical activity (Actigraph LLC accelerometer), resting heart rate, and physical fitness (VO₂max)
O
Outcome
Correlation between self-reported physical activity and objectively measured physical activity, resting heart rate, and physical fitnesssurrogate

Main Result

Effect estimate: ICC 0.62 (women) and 0.59 (men) (95% CI 0.51-0.71 (women), 0.47-0.69 (men))

Abstract

AIMS: To study the association between self-reported physical activity (PA) and objectively measured PA, resting heart rate, and physical fitness. METHODS: During 2007-08, 5017 men and 5607 women aged 30-69 years attended the sixth survey of the Tromsø study. Self-reported PA during leisure-time and work were assessed and resting heart rate was measured. In a sub-study, the activity study, PA (Actigraph LLC) and physical fitness (VO₂(max)) were objectively measured among 313 healthy men and women aged 40-44 years. RESULTS: Self-reported leisure PA was significantly correlated with VO₂(max) (ml/kg/min) (women 0.40, p 2000 counts/min) (women 0.28, p < 0.01, men 0.25, p < 0.01). The intra-class correlation coefficient between self-reported leisure PA and overall PA (counts/min) measured by accelerometer was 0.62 (95% CI 0.51, 0.71) for women and 0.59 (95% CI 0.47, 0.69) for men, and for VO₂(max) the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81, 0.90) for both sexes. Among all participants, an inverse dose-response relationship was observed between self-reported leisure PA and resting heart rate for both men and women (p < 0.0001). More women than men met the international recommendations of 10,000 step counts/day (27% vs. 22%) and the recommendation of at least 30 minutes/day of moderate-to-vigorous intensities (30% vs. 22 %). CONCLUSIONS: The Tromsø physical activity questionnaire has acceptable validity and provides valid estimates of high-intensity leisure activity. However, these results underscore the need for collecting objectively PA measurements in large epidemiological studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Emaus et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy adults (n=10,624). Self-reported physical activity vs. Objectively measured physical activity was evaluated on Correlation between self-reported leisure physical activity and overall physical activity measured by accelerometer (ICC 0.62 (women) and 0.59 (men), 95% CI 0.51-0.71 (women), 0.47-0.69 (men)). Self-reported leisure physical activity correlated moderately with objectively measured overall physical activity (ICC 0.62 for women and 0.59 for men) and physical fitness.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6cc7d92163a0a01bc29d5bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810378919
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper