PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2009Journal of Hypertension26 citations

Effects of losartan compared with atenolol on lipids in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study

View Full Paper
MOMichael Hecht OlsenKWKristian WachtellGBGareth Beevers

Key Result

Losartan reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with atenolol (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76-0.98; P<0.05).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=8,611)

Randomization

randomized

Structured PICO

Does losartan-based treatment improve HDL cholesterol and reduce the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared to atenolol-based treatment in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy?

P
Population
8,611 patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy followed for 4.8 years.
I
Intervention
Losartan-based treatment
C
Comparator
Atenolol-based treatment
O
Outcome
Composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or strokecomposite

Losartan blunts the decrease in HDL cholesterol compared to atenolol during antihypertensive treatment, which may partly explain its better cardiovascular outcomes.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.98)

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Beta-blockers and angiotensin II receptor blockers have different effects on lipids. METHODS: We examined lipid levels in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study and their impact on the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. We measured total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at baseline and annually during 4.8 years of losartan-based compared with atenolol-based treatment in 8611 patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. RESULTS: Patients randomized to losartan-based or atenolol-based treatment had similar baseline total (6.04 +/- 1.12 vs. 6.05 +/- 1.13 mmol/l, NS) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (1.50 +/- 0.44 vs. 1.49 +/- 0.44 mmol/l, NS). Total cholesterol decreased significantly but equally (-0.37 +/- 1.05 vs. -0.34 +/- 1.09 mmol/l, NS), whereas HDL cholesterol decreased less during the first 2 years in patients randomized to losartan compared with atenolol (-0.13 +/- 0.24 vs. -0.19 +/- 0.25 mmol/l) and remained higher each year (1.38, 1.37, 1.42, 1.47, and 1.48 mmol/l vs. 1.32, 1.30, 1.36, 1.40, and 1.42 mmol/l, all P < 0.001) independent of hydrochlorothiazide or statin treatment. In Cox regression analysis, baseline total cholesterol hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08 (1.02-1.14) per mmol/l, P < 0.01, HDL cholesterol HR = 0.56 (0.48-0.66) per mmol/l, P < 0.001, and treatment allocation HR = 0.86 (0.76-0.98), P < 0.05 predicted composite endpoint independently. Using time-varying analyses, the predictive strength of HDL cholesterol was increased HR = 0.36 (0.30-0.44) per mmol/l, P < 0.001, whereas that of total cholesterol HR = 1.03 (0.97-1.09) per mmol/l, NS and treatment allocation HR = 0.91 (0.80-1.03), NS were reduced. CONCLUSION: Losartan blunted the decrease in HDL cholesterol during antihypertensive treatment in the LIFE study. Higher intreatment HDL cholesterol was associated with fewer composite endpoints and may partly explain the better outcome of losartan-based treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Olsen et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (n=8,611). Losartan vs. Atenolol was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.98, p=<0.05). Losartan reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with atenolol (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76-0.98; P<0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6cd3e078a11c550e07adb9https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0b013e32831daf96
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol2002 · 5,434 citations
  2. 2Effects of losartan and atenolol on left ventricular mass and neurohormonal profile in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy2002 · 127 citations
  3. 3Blood pressure reduction and antihypertensive medication use in the losartan intervention for endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy2006 · 19 citations
  4. 4Systolic left ventricular function improves more by beta-blokade than losartan: the life study2003 · 1 citations
  5. 5Pulse Pressure and Effects of Losartan or Atenolol in Patients With Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy2005 · 40 citations