PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Principal-Agent Tensions as a Driver of Inefficiency, Mismanagement, and Corruption: A Comparative Analysis of State-Owned Enterprises and Privately-Owned Enterprises

View Full Paper
TMThabang R. MotswalediSMSysman Motloung

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how principal-agent tensions contribute to mismanagement, inefficiency, and corruption in both state-owned and privately-owned enterprises.
  • Qualitative research methods were employed to gather insights on principal-agent theories and policy frameworks.
  • The analysis focused on the effects of political interference and corruption in Nigeria and South Africa.
  • Comparative assessments of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and privately-owned enterprises (POEs) were conducted.
  • Political interference and self-enrichment in POEs and SOEs were identified as significant causes of inefficiency.
  • The study highlights that existing policy reforms have not mitigated the energy crisis in either Nigeria or South Africa.
  • Addressing corruption, infrastructure degradation, and energy racism is essential for achieving sustainable energy supply.

Abstract

abstract The main aim of this study is to highlight the principal-agent tensions that are associated with mismanagement, inefficiency and corruption in State-owned entities and Privately-owned entities (POE’s). The study is of the view that factors such as mismanagement, inefficiency and corruption are some of the key factors that leads of energy crisis in Nigeria and South Africa. Policy reforms in Nigeria and South Africa have been drafted and passed yet still the two states are still experiencing energy crisis. In addition, these issues of mismanagement, inefficiency and corruption are affecting both SOE’s and POE’s within their ability to discharge their services. With the employment of qualitative research methods, principal-agency theory and policy reforms in both SOE’s and POE’s. The study findings argues that political interference, racialised, othered energy poverty and private interests for self-enrichment in POEs as well as SOE’s are the centre of principal-agent tensions which leads to inefficiency of these institutions. Hence, it concludes that good governance, infrastructural development, and sustainable development (policy formulation and implementation) are key to attain stable energy supply in SOE’s and POE’s. Similarly, energy racism, infrastructure degradation, corruption and political intervention needs to be addressed to attained sustainable energy supply as per the SDG-7 goal of 2030. Keywords: Corruption, inefficiency, mismanagement, POE’s vs SOE’s, and policy reform.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Motswaledi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6d9892e258b358b3c6c22dhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21702465
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Theory-Praxis: Principals vs. Agents among Namibian Public Enterprises2025
  2. 2Evaluation of Critical Corporate Governance Issues within Nigeria's Top State-Owned Enterprises2024
  3. 3Exploring the Efficiency of Corporate Governance in State-Owned Agencies and Enterprises: A Comparative Analysis of Nigeria and Ghana2025
  4. 4LEGAL ANALYSIS OF STATUTORY AND ANTI-CORRUPTION ENFORCEMENT REGIMES IN THE PETROLEUM AND ELECTRICTY SECTORS OF NIGERIA2026
  5. 5The Political Economy of Resource Management in Nigeria: Governance, Accountability, and Sustainable Development2025