PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2026Circulation131 citationsOpen Access

Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug Eluting Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

View Full Paper
EMElizabeth A. MagnusonMFMichael E. FarkouhVFValentı́n Fuster

Key Points

  • Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease.
  • Randomized trial comparing PCI with drug-eluting stents (n=953) to CABG (n=947) from 2005 to 2010.
  • Costs assessed from the U.S. health care perspective using a microsimulation model based on life-tables.
  • Health state utilities measured with EuroQOL 5 dimension 3 level questionnaire.
  • Total costs for CABG were $3641 higher per patient over 5 years despite lower initial procedural costs.
  • CABG showed modest gains in survival during the trial, but projected substantial lifetime benefits.
  • Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for CABG were <$10,000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies from the balloon angioplasty and bare metal stent eras have demonstrated that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is cost-effective compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients undergoing multivessel coronary revascularization-particularly among patients with complex coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus. Whether these results apply in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2010, 1900 patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomized to PCI with DES (DES-PCI; n=953) or CABG (n=947). Costs were assessed from the perspective of the U. S. health care system. Health state utilities were assessed using the EuroQOL 5 dimension 3 level questionnaire. A patient-level microsimulation model based on U. S. life-tables and in-trial results was used to estimate lifetime cost-effectiveness. Although initial procedural costs were lower for CABG, total costs for the index hospitalization were 8622 higher per patient. Over the next 5 years, follow-up costs were higher with PCI, owing to more frequent repeat revascularization and higher outpatient medication costs. Nonetheless, cumulative 5-year costs remained 3641 higher per patient with CABG. Although there were only modest gains in survival with CABG during the trial period, when the in-trial results were extended to a lifetime horizon, CABG was projected to be economically attractive relative to DES-PCI, with substantial gains in both life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios <10 000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained across a broad range of assumptions regarding the effect of CABG on post-trial survival and costs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher initial costs, CABG is a highly cost-effective revascularization strategy compared with DES-PCI for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http: //www. clinical-trials. gov. Unique identifier: NCT00086450.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Magnuson et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6dba08d974370aceb8303ehttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.112.147488
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper