PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 13, 2026Frontiers in Microbiology11 citationsOpen Access

Molecular resistance mechanisms to newly approved antibiotics (2017–2025) in WHO priority pathogens

MSM. SartoriSTS. ToppoELE. Lavezzo

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The relentless rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical threat to global public health, rendering once-effective therapies obsolete. In response, several novel antibiotics have been developed in recent years. This review systematically summarizes the molecular resistance mechanisms that World Health Organization (WHO) priority bacterial pathogens have already deployed against the 15 new antibiotics approved between 2017 and 2025, including β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam), tetracycline derivatives (eravacycline, omadacycline), a pleuromutilin (lefamulin), an aminoglycoside (plazomicin), and a fluoroquinolone (delafloxacin). We detail how pathogens utilize four primary strategies to overcome these last-line agents: enzymatic inactivation (e.g., by KPC, NDM, OXA-48, and Tet(X) variants), efflux pump overexpression (e.g., AdeABC, AcrAB-TolC, MexAB-OprM), modifications of target sites (e.g., PBP3, RpoB, ribosomal proteins/L3, and QRDR mutations), and reduced membrane permeability. Evidence consistently demonstrates that resistance emerges rapidly, often through pre-existing genetic pathways repurposed against the new chemical structures. This analysis underscores the paradoxical reality of antimicrobial development: the introduction of new therapies simultaneously selects for and elucidates new resistance mechanisms. Preserving the efficacy of these essential drugs thus necessitates a multifaceted, globally coordinated "One Health" strategy. Finally, we discuss how the growing complexity of AMR mechanisms is driving the need for advanced diagnostic tools, exploring the pivotal role of bioinformatics and artificial intelligence in predicting resistance and closing knowledge gaps.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sartori et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6dc2a978a11c550e082045https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1719798
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1MSDeepAMR: antimicrobial resistance prediction based on deep neural networks and transfer learning2024 · 45 citations
  2. 2Molecular analysis of metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Switzerland 2022–20232024 · 14 citations
  3. 3Ciprofloxacin-susceptible but levofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains with Vitek®2: which mechanism involved and consequences in case of fluoroquinolone treatment?2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Assessment of Activity and Resistance Mechanisms to Cefepime in Combination with the Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitors Zidebactam, Taniborbactam, and Enmetazobactam against a Multicenter Collection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales2021 · 66 citations
  5. 5Antibiotic susceptibility among non-clinical Escherichia coli as a marker of antibiotic pressure in Peru (2009–2019): one health approach2022 · 13 citations