PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 10, 2005Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases144 citations

Assessing chemokine co-receptor usage in HIV

View Full Paper
ECEoin CoakleyCPChristos J. PetropoulosJWJeannette M. Whitcomb

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: HIV entry into cells is mediated through sequential interactions between HIV envelope proteins (Env) and two cellular molecules: CD4 and a co-receptor, typically either CCR5 or CXCR4. Co-receptor preference has been associated with other viral traits; specifically, CXCR4-tropic viruses have been associated with increased host cell pathogenicity and more rapid progression of disease. Recently, much attention has been focused on the development of CCR5 and CXCR4 antagonists as antiviral agents and several are set to enter phase III trials in 2004 and 2005. The development of assays to assess the co-receptor tropism of HIV populations is critical for the optimal design and performance of clinical trials to evaluate these agents. In addition, the use of these agents in a clinical setting is likely to benefit from a reliable methodology for tropism determination prior to the selection of an optimal antiviral therapy or to evaluate continued efficacy of a regimen. RECENT FINDINGS: Tropism assays that use recombinant viruses and pseudotyped HIV are becoming more commonly employed and comparative data with standard assays have begun to be accumulated. These assays are being used to expand on earlier studies of the epidemiology and natural history of HIV tropism. In addition, tropism assays have facilitated the study of co-receptor inhibitors in vitro and in phase I and II trials. SUMMARY: The development of rapid, reliable tropism assays has been useful in advancing the development of novel antiviral agents. Defining the role of these assays in routine clinical practice will be the next important step.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coakley et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6eadde5d37378ac1dc05b5https://doi.org/10.1097/00001432-200502000-00003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Zidovudine Resistance and HIV-1 Disease Progression during Antiretroviral Therapy1995 · 254 citations
  2. 2CCR5- and CXCR4-Utilizing Strains of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Exhibit Differential Tropism and Pathogenesis In Vivo1998 · 105 citations
  3. 3HIV-1 Coreceptor Usage, Transmission, and Disease Progression2003 · 106 citations
  4. 4Sensitivity of HIV-1 to entry inhibitors correlates with envelope/coreceptor affinity, receptor density, and fusion kinetics2002 · 406 citations
  5. 5Emergence of Syncytium-Inducing Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Variants Coincides with a Transient Increase in Viral RNA Level and Is an Independent Predictor for Progression to AIDS1998 · 40 citations