PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 13, 2022Hypertension43 citationsOpen Access

Carotid Artery Stiffness Mechanisms Associated With Cardiovascular Disease Events and Incident Hypertension: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

View Full Paper
RPRyan PewowarukCKClaudia E. KorcarzYTYacob G. Tedla

Key Result

Higher load-dependent carotid artery stiffness was associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular disease events (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.09-1.34; P<0.001), whereas structural stiffness was not.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=5,873)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Are load-dependent and structural carotid artery stiffness associated with incident CVD events and hypertension in individuals without baseline CVD?

P
Population
5,873 men and women without cardiovascular disease at enrollment from 6 US communities, followed for a mean of 14.3 years.
E
Exposure
Load-dependent and structural carotid artery stiffness (calculated from Peterson's elastic modulus)
O
Outcome
Incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) eventshard clinical

Load-dependent carotid artery stiffness, but not structural stiffness, is significantly associated with incident cardiovascular events and hypertension.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 1.21 (95% CI 1.09–1.34)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

Background: Elastic arteries stiffen via 2 main mechanisms: (1) load-dependent stiffening from higher blood pressure and (2) structural stiffening due to changes in the vessel wall. It is unknown how these different mechanisms contribute to incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Methods: The MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) is a longitudinal study of 6814 men and women without CVD at enrollment, from 6 communities in the United States. MESA participants with B-mode carotid ultrasound and brachial blood pressure at baseline Exam in (2000–2002) and CVD surveillance (mean follow-up 14.3 years through 2018) were included (n=5873). Peterson’s elastic modulus was calculated to represent total arterial stiffness. Structural stiffness was calculated by adjusting Peterson’s elastic modulus to a standard blood pressure of 120/80 mm Hg with participant-specific models. Load-dependent stiffness was the difference between total and structural stiffness. Results: In Cox models adjusted for traditional risk factors, load-dependent stiffness was significantly associated with higher incidence of CVD events (hazard ratio/100 mm Hg, 1.21 95% CI, 1.09–1.34 P <0.001) events while higher structural stiffness was not (hazard ratio, 1.03 95% CI, 0.99–1.07 P =0.10). Analysis of participants who were normotensive (blood pressure <130/80, no antihypertensives) at baseline exam (n=2122) found higher load-dependent stiffness was also associated with significantly higher incidence of hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.53 95% CI, 1.35–1.75 P <0.001) while higher structural stiffness was not (hazard ratio, 1.03 95% CI, 0.99–1.07 P =0.16). Conclusions: These results provide valuable new insights into mechanisms underlying the association between arterial stiffness and CVD. Load-dependent stiffness was significantly associated with CVD events but structural stiffness was not.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pewowaruk et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=5,873). Load-dependent carotid artery stiffness was evaluated on incidence of CVD events (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.34, p=<0.001). Higher load-dependent carotid artery stiffness was associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular disease events (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.09-1.34; P<0.001), whereas structural stiffness was not.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6eca3635aa2c282ce065fehttps://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.18772
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper