PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 20, 2025Journal of the American Chemical Society2 citationsOpen Access

Kinetics and Mechanism of Enantioselective Cu-Catalyzed Alcohol Silylation

POPedro H. Helou de OliveiraJSJan SeligerSRSihong Rao

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The enantioselective Cu-catalyzed dehydrogenative Si–O coupling of secondary benzylic alcohols with ( n Bu) 3 SiH was investigated using a combination of in situ 1 H/ 19 F NMR spectroscopic reaction monitoring, isotopic labeling, kinetic modeling, and computational studies. Macrokinetic behavior is governed by substrate-inhibited L*CuOR·ROH resting states: rates rise with conversion when ( n Bu) 3 SiH > ROH and fall when ( n Bu) 3 SiH < ROH. Alcohols bearing electron-withdrawing substituents are stronger inhibitors and show overall lower macrokinetic reactivity, but react faster than alcohols with electron-donating substituents in intermolecular competitions, indicating that inhibition is more substituent-sensitive than the product-committing step. Divergence between intrinsic enantioselectivity and observed macrokinetic rates of enantiomers in isolation results from enantiomer-dependent inhibition, and a product-committing σ-bond-metathesis step is consistent with measured Eyring activation parameters and a Si–H/Si–D KIE ≤ 1.3. Eyring and Hammett analyses, as well as DFT calculations, support an H-bonding inhibition mode for the L*CuOR·ROH resting state. Stoichiometric styrene as an additive suppresses H 2 generation and mitigates catalyst deactivation, increasing process safety and efficiency. Dynamic kinetic resolution, enabled by addition of a ruthenium racemization cocatalyst, results in reaction rates comparable to those of the faster enantiomer while improving overall efficiency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oliveira et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6edfabe36a167817e0b413https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c14937
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper