PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 2003Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres475 citationsOpen Access

Characterization of soil dust aerosol in China and its transport and distribution during 2001 ACE‐Asia: 1. Network observations

View Full Paper
XZX. Y. ZhangSGS. L. GongZSZichao Shen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Mass loading, 20 elemental concentrations, and time series of aerosol particles were investigated over the China Dust Storm Research (ChinaDSR) observational network stations from March to May 2001 during the intensive field campaign period of ACE‐Asia. Four extensive and several minor dust storm (DS) events were observed. Mass balance calculations showed that 45–82% of the observed aerosol mass was attributable to Asian soil dust particles among the sites, in which Ca and Fe contents are enriched to 12% and 6%, respectively, in the Western High‐Dust source regions compared with dust aerosols ejected from the Northern High‐Dust source regions. For the latter areas, elemental contents exhibited high Si (30%) and low Fe (4%). For all major source areas and depositional regions, aluminium (Al) comprises 7% of Asian dust. Air mass back‐trajectory analysis showed that five major transport pathways of Asian dust storms dominated dust transport in China during spring 2001, all of which passed over Beijing. Measurements also suggest that the sand land in northeastern China is a potential source for Asian dust. The size distribution for estimating vertical dust flux was derived from the observed surface dust size distributions in the desert regions. For particle diameters between 0.25 and 16 μm, a lognormal distribution was obtained from averaging observations at various deserts with a mass mean diameter of 4.5 μm and a standard deviation of 1.5. This range of soil dust constitutes about 69% of the total dust loading. The fractions for particles in the size ranges of 16 μm are around 1.7% and 30%, respectively.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f1fc58031ec7bb1db9adbhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002632
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Characterization of Atmospheric Aerosol over XiAn in the South Margin of the Loess Plateau, China2002 · 158 citations
  2. 2Concentration, size-distribution and deposition of mineral aerosol over Chinese desert regions1998 · 131 citations
  3. 3Dust emission from Chinese desert sources linked to variations in atmospheric circulation1997 · 566 citations
  4. 4The influence on climate forcing of mineral aerosols from disturbed soils1996 · 1,021 citations
  5. 5Chemical Characteristics of PM10Aerosols Collected in the Los Angeles Area1989 · 71 citations