PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 8, 2010Internal Medicine Journal18 citationsOpen Access

An invasive management strategy is associated with improved outcomes in high‐risk acute coronary syndromes in patients with chronic kidney disease

View Full Paper
CMC. MediDCDerek P. ChewJAJohn Amerena

Structured PICO

Does an invasive management strategy reduce 6-month mortality in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes and chronic kidney disease?

P
Population
2,597 patients presenting with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or intermediate- to high-risk non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS), stratified by kidney function (normal GFR≥60, moderate CKD GFR 30-59, severe CKD GFR<30).
I
Intervention
Coronary angiography (invasive management strategy)
C
Comparator
No prior angiography (conservative management)
O
Outcome
6-month mortalityhard clinical

An invasive management strategy is associated with reduced 6-month mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes and chronic kidney disease, despite a higher risk of acute kidney injury.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with poor outcomes after acute coronary syndromes, yet selection for invasive investigation and management is low. METHODS: Patients presenting with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or intermediate- to high-risk non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) (n=2597) were stratified into groups based on kidney function, defined as normal (glomerular filtration rate (GFR)≥60mL/min/1.73m(2) ), moderate CKD (GFR 30-59mL/min/1.73m(2) ) and severe CKD (GFR <30mL/min/1.73m(2)). Based on these stratums of kidney function, incidence and outcome measures were obtained for: rates of angiography and revascularization; 6-month mortality; and the incidence and outcome of in-hospital acute kidney impairment (AKI). RESULTS: Patients with CKD were less likely to be offered coronary angiography after STEMI/NSTEACS (P<0.001); however, after selection, revascularization rates were similar (percutaneous coronary intervention (P=0.8); surgery (P=0.4)). Six-month mortality rates increased with CKD (GFR≥60, 2.8%; GFR 30-59, 9.9%; GFR<30, 16.5%, P≤0.001), as well as the combined efficacy/safety end-point (GFR≥60, 9.4%; GFR 30-59, 20.2%; GFR<30, 27.1%, P≤0.001). Six-month mortality was lower in patients who had received prior angiography (GFR≥60, 1.5% vs 3.6%, P=0.001; GFR 30-59, 5.1% vs 12.7%, P<0.001; GFR<30, 7.3% vs 18.5%, P=0.094). Risk of AKI increased with CKD (GFR≥60, 0.7%; GFR 30-59, 3.4%; GFR<30, 6.8%, P≤0.001), and was associated with high 6-month mortality (35.6% vs 4.1%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CKD after STEMI/NSTEACS, 6-month mortality and morbidity is high, selection for angiography is lower, yet angiography is associated with a reduced long-term mortality, and with comparable revascularization rates to those without CKD. In-hospital AKI is more common in CKD and predicts a high 6-month mortality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Medi et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f22f6ac440176ef27d992https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02361.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper