PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1989Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology4 citations

Effect of Verapamil on Systemic and Brachial Artery Hemodynamics in Normal Humans

View Full Paper
LVL. VanheesRFR. FagardAAA. Amery

Structured PICO

Does short-term verapamil administration alter systemic and brachial artery hemodynamics in normal humans?

P
Population
Normal human volunteers
I
Intervention
Verapamil 240 mg/day for 4 days
C
Comparator
Placebo and atenolol 100 mg/day
O
Outcome
Left ventricular function, systemic hemodynamics, and brachial artery hemodynamicssurrogate

Short-term verapamil administration in normal humans produces systemic and brachial artery vasodilatation with a reflex increase in stroke volume, contrasting with the hemodynamic effects of atenolol.

Abstract

To clarify the hemodynamic effects of verapamil, we investigated in normal volunteers the effects of 4-day treatment with verapamil (240 mg/day) on left ventricular function and on systemic and brachial artery haemodynamics, in comparison with the effects of placebo and atenolol (100 mg/day). Left ventricular structure and function was evaluated by echocardiography, systemic hemodynamics were assessed by pulsed Doppler velocimetry of the ascending aorta, and brachial artery hemodynamics were assessed pulsed Doppler velocimetry of the brachial artery. Verapamil decreased systemic and brachial artery vascular resistance (p less than 0.05), increased cardiac output (CO, p less than 0.01) and brachial flow (p = 0.054), and did not affect blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). In contrast, atenolol decreased BP, HR, and CO (p less than 0.001) but did not significantly affect brachial flow and systemic and brachial artery vascular resistance. We conclude that short-term administration of verapamil in normal humans produces systemic and brachial artery vasodilatation, with a reflex increase of stroke volume but not of HR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vanhees et al. (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f38be75498292b7089cfahttps://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-198910000-00017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper