PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 29, 2015PLoS ONE50 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea

MCMin Gon ChungHKHojeong KangSCSung‐Uk Choi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Despite the fact that scientific and political consideration for ecosystem services has dramatically increased over the past decade, few studies have focused on marine and coastal ecosystem services for conservation strategies. We used an ecosystem services approach to assess spatial distributions of habitat risks and four ecosystem services (coastal protection, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality), and explored the tradeoffs among them in coastal areas of South Korea. Additionally, we analyzed how the social and ecological characteristics in coastal areas interact with conservation and development policies by using this approach. We found strong negative associations between the habitat risks and ecosystem services (aquaculture, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality) across the coastal counties. Our results showed that the intensity of the habitat risks and the provision of ecosystem services were significantly different between reclamation-dominated and conservation-dominated counties, except for coastal vulnerability. A generalized linear model suggested that reclamation projects were dependent on economic efficiency, whereas demographic pressures and habitat conditions influenced the designation of protected areas at a county level. The ecosystem services approach provided guidelines to achieve both sustainable development and environment conservation. By using the approach, we can select the priority areas for developments while we can minimize the degradation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. As cultural ecosystem services are evenly distributed throughout coastal areas of South Korea, decision makers may employ them to improve the conditions of coastal wetlands outside of protected areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chung et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f540935aa2c282ce0b4d0https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133856
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Land Use in Korean Tidal Wetlands: Impacts and Management Strategies2008 · 60 citations
  2. 2Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century2010 · 1,440 citations
  3. 3Marine and coastal ecosystems and human well-being: A synthesis report based on the findings of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment2006 · 427 citations
  4. 4Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies2010 · 2,286 citations
  5. 5The East Asian Development Model2006 · 9 citations