PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1978Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume388 citations

Bone loss in response to long-term immobilisation

View Full Paper
HUHK UhthoffZJZ Jaworski

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The histodynamic response to long-term "non-traumatic" immobilisation was studied in young adult Beagle dogs by means of radiomorphometry and histomorphometry, the right forelimb being encased in plaster and the left forelimb serving as a control. The dogs were killed at two, four, six, eight, twelve, sixteen, twenty, twenty-four, thirty-two and forty weeks and the third metacarpal, radius, ulna and humerus removed for analysis of the contributions of the periosteal, haversian and endosteal envelopes to the bone loss at the mid-diaphysis. The bone mass responded to long-term immobilisation in three stages. First there was a rapid initial loss of bone, reaching its maximum (some 16 per cent of original mass) at six weeks, to which all three bone envelopes, to some extent, contributed. A rapid reversal followed, the bone mass approaching the control values between eight and twelve weeks after immobilisation. A second stage of slower but longer lasting bone loss ended twenty-four to thirty-two weeks after immobilisation; the periosteal envelope was the main contributor (80 to 90 per cent of the total loss). The third stage was characterised by maintenance of the bone mass which had been reduced by some 30 to 50 per cent of original values. This pattern was qualitatively similar in all four bones but the distal bones lost more bone than the proximal bones. The extent of resorption surface and the total histologically "active" periosteal envelope increased parallel to the phases of bone loss. The linear mineralisation rate did not differ significantly between the experimental and control sides.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Uhthoff et al. (1978) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f84b9a528af2d65c30852https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.60b3.681422
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1MUSCLE ACTION, BONE RAREFACTION AND BONE FORMATION1958 · 175 citations
  2. 2ETIOLOGY OF TRAUMATIC OSTEOPOROSIS1953 · 14 citations
  3. 3Metabolic Bone Diseases2019 · 93 citations
  4. 4Effects of Fluoride Intake on Disuse Atrophy of Bone in Rats1966 · 21 citations
  5. 5Effects of Recumbency and Space Flight on Bone Density1967 · 77 citations