PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 7, 2018Wind Energy85 citationsOpen Access

An improved random forest model of short‐term wind‐power forecasting to enhance accuracy, efficiency, and robustness

View Full Paper
KSKunpeng ShiYQYing QiaoWZWei Zhao

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Short‐term wind‐power forecasting methods like neural networks are trained by empirical risk minimization. The local optimum and overfitting problem is likely to occur in the model‐training stage, leading to the poor ability of reasoning and generalization in the prediction stage. To solve the problem, a model of short‐term wind power forecasting is proposed based on 2‐stage feature selection and a supervised random forest in the paper. First, in data preprocessing, some redundant features can be removed by a variable importance measure method and intimate samples can be selected based on relevant analysis, so that the efficiency of model training and the correlation degree between input and output samples can be enhanced. Second, an improved supervised random forest (RF) methodology is proposed to compose a new RF based on evaluating the performance of each decision tree and restructuring the decision trees. A new index of external validation in correlation with wind speed in numerical weather prediction has been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of the internal validation index that seriously depends on the training samples. The simulation examples have verified the rationality and feasibility of the improvement. Case studies of measured data from a wind farm have shown that the proposed model has a better performance than the original RF, back propagation neural network, Bayesian network, and support vector machine, in aspects of ensuring accuracy, efficiency, and robustness, and especially if there is high rate of noisy data and wind power curtailment duration in the historical data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shi et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f920ef44fa9f079dd0754https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2261
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Error estimation based on variance analysis of k -fold cross-validation2017 · 181 citations
  2. 2Effect of the subsampling ratio in the application of subagging for multivariate calibration with the successive projections algorithm2011 · 8 citations
  3. 3Factors Influencing Wind Energy Curtailment2011 · 154 citations
  4. 4A comparison of internal and external cluster validation indexes2011 · 90 citations
  5. 5Implementation of a Model Output Statistics based on meteorological variable screening for short‐term wind power forecast2012 · 17 citations