PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2012Anaesthesia152 citationsOpen Access

A comparison of the Nexfin ® and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery

View Full Paper
OBOle BrochJRJochen RennerMGMatthias Gruenewald

Structured PICO

Does the Nexfin device reliably estimate cardiac output compared to transcardiopulmonary thermodilution in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

P
Population
n=40 patients with preserved left ventricular function undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery
I
Intervention
Nexfin device (non-invasive finger cuff blood pressure trace analysis) for estimating cardiac output
C
Comparator
PiCCO using transcardiopulmonary thermodilution
O
Outcome
Correlation and agreement (bias) of cardiac output measurements between Nexfin and PiCCO before and after cardiopulmonary bypasssurrogate

The Nexfin device provides a reliable, non-invasive method for measuring cardiac output during and after cardiac surgery, showing good agreement with invasive transcardiopulmonary thermodilution.

Abstract

The newly introduced Nexfin(®) device allows analysis of the blood pressure trace produced by a non-invasive finger cuff. We compared the cardiac output derived from the Nexfin and PiCCO, using transcardiopulmonary thermodilution, during cardiac surgery. Forty patients with preserved left ventricular function undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were studied after induction of general anaesthesia and until discharge to the intensive care unit. There was a significant correlation between Nexfin and PiCCO before (r(2) = 0.81, p < 0.001) and after (r(2) = 0.56, p < 0.001) cardiopulmonary bypass. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated the mean bias of Nexfin to be -0.1 (95% limits of agreement -0.6 to +0.5, percentage error 23%) and -0.1 (-0.8 to +0.6, 26%) l.min(-1).m(-2), before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, respectively. After a passive leg-raise was performed, there was also good correlation between the two methods, both before (r(2) = 0.72, p < 0.001) and after (r(2) = 0.76, p < 0.001) cardiopulmonary bypass. We conclude that the Nexfin is a reliable method of measuring cardiac output during and after cardiac surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Broch et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f99aee5469ee92be07feehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07018.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper