PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2008Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology21 citationsOpen Access

United States Patient Preference and Usability for the New Disposable Insulin Device Solostar® versus other Disposable Pens

JFJerome S. FischerSESteven V. EdelmanSSSherwyn Schwartz

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The uptake of insulin pen use has been slow in the United States, despite their advantages over the vial/ syringe. We present results of a United States subset of 150 patients with type 1/type 2 diabetes, who were enrolled in an open-label study, that assessed usability, pen features, and patient preferences for four prefilled insulin pens: SoloSTAR, FlexPen, Lilly disposable pen, and a prototype, Pen X. Overall, the SoloSTAR and FlexPen were more user-friendly; 95 and 88% of patients, respectively, completed the steps correctly (without safety/attach-needle step-deemed independent of device) versus the Lilly disposable pen (60%) and Pen X (61%; all p < 0.05). The SoloSTAR was rated highest most frequently for pen feature comparisons. Results suggest that the SoloSTAR and FlexPen could potentially facilitate insulin use in the United States.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fischer et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6fbc8931a3df8243280f6dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/193229680800200626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper