PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2013European Journal of Preventive Cardiology18 citationsOpen Access

Cardiac patients who completed a longitudinal psychosocial study had a different clinical and psychosocial baseline profile than patients who dropped out prematurely

View Full Paper
NDNikki L. DamenHVHenneke VersteegPSPatrick W. Serruys

Structured PICO

Does dropping out of a longitudinal psychosocial study reflect a different baseline profile and mortality risk compared to completing the study in patients undergoing PCI?

P
Population
1132 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
I
Intervention
Completing a longitudinal psychosocial study (completers, n=802)
C
Comparator
Dropping out prematurely from the psychosocial study (drop-outs, n=330)
O
Outcome
Mortality risk at median 4 years follow-uphard clinical

Patients who drop out of longitudinal psychosocial studies have worse baseline psychological profiles but similar long-term mortality compared to completers.

Abstract

Non-response is a serious threat to the external validity of longitudinal psychosocial studies. Little is known about potential systematic differences between patients with coronary artery disease who complete a psychosocial study and those who drop out prematurely due to non-response, or whether drop-outs may have a different cardiovascular risk. We studied a cohort of 1132 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). At baseline, all patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Type D Scale (DS14). At 12 months follow-up, 70.8% (n = 802) of patients completed both questionnaires, while 29.2% (n = 330) dropped out. We observed significant differences in socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological baseline characteristics between completers and drop-outs. Drop-outs were younger, more likely to smoke, but less often prescribed cardiovascular medications, including calcium antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, as compared with completers. Drop-outs more often had depression, anxiety, and negative affectivity, as compared with completers (all p-values <0.05). After a median follow-up of 4 years, we found no significant differences in mortality risk between completers and drop-outs (6.5 vs. 7.3%; adjusted HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.82-2.19, respectively). In conclusion, a possible attrition bias occurred, as drop-outs and completers differed systematically on some socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological baseline characteristics. Despite these differences, this did not translate into a poorer short-term prognosis, as there were no differences in the mortality risk of completers vs. drop-outs after a median follow-up of 4 years. In future prospective studies, attention should be paid to attrition bias, and its possible impact on study results and implications should be discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Damen et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6ff45e35aa2c282ce141e8https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487313506548
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper