PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 11, 2006Journal of Clinical Oncology162 citations

Phase III Trial Comparing Three Doses of Docetaxel for Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

View Full Paper
VHVernon HarveyHMHenning T. MouridsenSVSemiglazov Vf

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a relationship exists between docetaxel dose and clinical response in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients whose cancer had progressed after one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced breast cancer or had recurred during or within 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to docetaxel 60, 75, or 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-seven patients were randomly assigned (intent to treat ITT), and 524 were assessable for toxicity. In the population assessable for efficacy (n = 407), logistic regression analysis showed that increasing docetaxel dose was significantly associated with higher response rate (P = .007) and improved time to progression (TTP; P = .014). In the ITT analysis, a significant dose-response relationship was observed for tumor response (P = .026) but not for TTP (P = .067). The incidences of most hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were related to increasing dose, with grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurring in 76.4%, 83.7%, and 93.4% and febrile neutropenia occurring in 4.7%, 7.4%, and 14.1% of patients administered the 60, 75, and 100 mg/m2 doses, respectively. One death was considered treatment related. CONCLUSION: A relationship between increasing dose of docetaxel and increased tumor response was observed across the dose range of 60 to 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Toxicities were related to increasing dose. Depending on the therapy goal, any of the doses studied may be appropriate for second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harvey et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6ff7caf44fa9f079dd7a80https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.05.0294
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of Taxotere (docetaxel).1993 · 85 citations
  2. 2Phase II trial of docetaxel: a new, highly effective antineoplastic agent in the management of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer.1995 · 388 citations
  3. 3Phase II trial of docetaxel in advanced anthracycline-resistant or anthracenedione-resistant breast cancer.1995 · 319 citations
  4. 4Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Doxorubicin in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer1999 · 641 citations
  5. 5[Late phase II clinical study of RP56976 (docetaxel) in patients with advanced/recurrent breast cancer].1994 · 20 citations