PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2005Geophysical Research Letters70 citationsOpen Access

Remotely‐sensed chl a at the Chesapeake Bay mouth is correlated with annual freshwater flow to Chesapeake Bay

View Full Paper
JAJames G. AckerLHLawrence W. HardingGLGregory Leptoukh

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

High freshwater flow delivers excess nutrients to Chesapeake Bay, leading to increased phytoplankton biomass, turbidity, and eutrophication. Low flow in 2002 was associated with a persistent drought that terminated abruptly in autumn 2002, followed by extremely high flow in 2003. This large difference in flow caused improved water quality in 2002 as nutrient loading subsided, and degraded water quality in 2003 with increased loading associated with high flow. We analyzed remotely sensed chlorophyll (chl a ) data using an online data analysis tool to quantify the effect of sequential low and high freshwater flow on phytoplankton biomass near the mouth of the Bay. Chl a in the study area was significantly higher in 2003 than in 2002, consistent with strong forcing by freshwater flow and nutrient loading in the nutrient‐limited region of the Bay.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Acker et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7028bbaf0c21e93928056bhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl021852
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper