PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 15, 2020BMC Cardiovascular Disorders10 citationsOpen Access

Prognosis evaluation of universal acute coronary syndrome: the interplay between SYNTAX score and ApoB/ApoA1

XWXiaotong WangZWZhongyu WangBLBing Li

Structured PICO

Do SYNTAX score, SYNTAX II score, and ApoB/ApoA1 ratio predict MACCE and quality of life in patients with universal ACS undergoing PCI?

P
Population
396 patients with universal acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary stenting from 2013 to 2014
I
Intervention
Risk stratification using SYNTAX score, SYNTAX II score, and ApoB/ApoA1 ratio
C
Comparator
Comparison between low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk groups based on SYNTAX and SYNTAX II scores
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) over 5 yearscomposite

SYNTAX score predicts short-term prognosis, while SYNTAX II score and ApoB/ApoA1 ratio are better predictors of long-term MACCE and cardiovascular mortality in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a group of clinical syndromes associated with substantial morbidity and mortality rate. SYNTAX and SYNTAX II score used to be a reference for surgical selection of coronary revascularization and prognosis evaluation in patients with 3-vessel or left main artery disease. In addition, apoB/apoA1 is an important predictor of ACS risk. This study aims to assess the prognosis value of different kinds of SYNTAX score together with apoB/apoA1 in universal ACS patients (Regardless of ACS type, lesion location and vessel numbers). METHOD: Three hundred ninety-six patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)and coronary stenting from 2013 to 2014 were chosen and recorded the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and quality of life during the next 5 years. According to SYNTAX and SYNTAX II score, the patients were divided into low-risk, medium-risk and high-risk groups, and the clinical features, MACCE incidence and EQ-5D score at each time points were compared. And the predictive factors of MACCE incidence were analyzed. RESULTS: ① Compared with SYNTAX low-risk group, MACCE incidence in 1 year significantly increased in medium/high risk group (p = 0.011). Compared with SYNTAX II low-risk group, MACCE incidence in 5 years significantly increased in medium and high-risk group (p = 0.032). ② Compared with SYNTAX II low-risk group, cardiovascular mortality in 3 and 5 years significantly elevated in high-risk group (p = 0.001, p<0.001 respectively). ③ Compared with SYNTAX II low and medium-risk group, EQ-5D score in 5 years significantly decreased in high-risk group (p = 0.019, p = 0.023 respectively). ④ ApoB/ApoA1 was more likely to be classified as high risk in SYNTAX/SYNTAX II medium and high-risk group (p = 0.023, p = 0.044 respectively). ⑤ Logistic regression analysis showed that apoB/apoA1 was an independent predictor of MACCE events in hospital and 5 years (p = 0.038, p = 0.016 respectively), SYNTAX score was an independent predictor of MACCE events in 1 year (medium-risk group: p = 0.02; high-risk group: p = 0.015) SYNTAX II score was an independent predictor of MACCE events in 5 yeasrs (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: ① SYNTAX score has a high predictive value for short-term prognosis while SYNTAX II score is more predictive of long-term prognosis. ② SYNTAX II score is superior to SYNTAX score in predicting cardiovascular death. ③ The combination of apoB/apoA1 high-risk and SYNTAX II medium and high-risk group is the focus of clinical treatment and long-term follow-up observation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a703840a528af2d65c36571https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01562-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper