PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1996The Journal of Law Economics and Organization366 citations

The Costs and Benefits of Privatization: An Incomplete Contracts Approach

View Full Paper
KSKlaus M. Schmidt

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article develops a model of a privatization using an incomplete contracts approach. We argue that different allocations of ownership rights lead to different allocations of inside information about the firm, which in turn affect both allocative and productive effieciency. Privatization is seen as a commitment device of the government to credibly threaten to cut back subsidies if costs are high in order to give managers better cost-saving incentives (a “harder budget constraint”). The cost of privatization is that allocative efficiency is distorted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Klaus M. Schmidt (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a703ef28031ec7bb1dc357ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023354
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper