PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2020European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery71 citationsOpen Access

Final 5-year outcomes following aortic valve replacement with a RESILIA™ tissue bioprosthesis

View Full Paper
KBKrzysztof BartuśRLRadosław LitwinowiczABAgata Bilewska

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the long-term clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of the RESILIA tissue bioprosthesis.
  • Prospective, non-randomized, single-arm study of 133 patients implanted with RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis.

Structured PICO

P
Population
133 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, mean age 65.3 ± 13.5 years, with 25.6% ≤60 years of age, at 2 sites in Poland.
I
Intervention
Aortic valve replacement with a RESILIA tissue bioprosthesis
O
Outcome
5-year clinical and haemodynamic outcomes (including structural valve deterioration, mortality, mean gradient, and effective orifice area)safety

The RESILIA tissue bioprosthesis demonstrated excellent 5-year hemodynamic performance and safety with zero cases of structural valve deterioration in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Long-term durability of bioprosthetic valves is predominantly limited by structural valve deterioration. RESILIA™ tissue has exhibited reduced calcification in pre-clinical and early clinical studies. This study evaluated the 5-year clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of an aortic valve with this tissue. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm study of 133 patients implanted with a RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis between July 2011 and February 2013 at 2 sites in Poland. Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic performance were assessed annually for 5 years post-implant. Safety events were adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee and echocardiographic data were assessed by an independent core laboratory. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65.3 ± 13.5 years, with 34 patients (25.6%) ≤60. The mean follow-up was 4.2 ± 1.5 years. Early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) all-cause mortality were 2.3% (N = 3) and 3.2%/late patients-years (N = 18) respectively. Early events included thromboembolism in 3 patients (2.3%). Late valve-related events included endocarditis in 1 patient, which led to explant, and valve thrombosis in another patient. There were no events of structural valve deterioration throughout the study. At 5 years, mean gradient was 14.8 ± 7.6 mmHg and effective orifice area was 1.4 ± 0.5 cm2, a marked improvement over baseline values. All New York Heart Association class III patients and most class II patients at baseline had improved classifications at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The bioprosthesis with RESILIA tissue demonstrated a good safety profile with excellent haemodynamic performance over 5 years of follow-up. These encouraging outcomes warrant additional investigation of this novel tissue. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01651052.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bartuś et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70556735aa2c282ce1a338https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa311
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper