PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1996Language Testing88 citations

A comparison of recall and summary protocols as measures of second language reading comprehension

View Full Paper
GRGail L. RileyJLJames F. Lee

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of test method on the reading performance of two levels of early-stage L2 readers of French. L2 reading research examining test methods has focused primarily on discrete- point modes of response. This study compared two global response modes, the summary and the recall protocol. Half of the 80 subjects were asked to read a passage and to write a summary of the passage and the other half were asked to read the passage and to recall it. The written protocols were analysed for total number of idea units as well as the number of main ideas, supporting ideas and details. The total number of idea units was submitted to a two-way analysis of variance. The three levels of idea units were submitted to separate two-way analyses of variance. Results indicate a significant qualitative difference in the performance on the two tasks. The summaries contained significantly more main ideas than the recall protocols. Fur thermore, the summaries contained a higher percentage of main ideas than details whereas the recall protocols contained a higher percentage of details than main ideas. The results have research and pedagogical implications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Riley et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a705bc3e71d69abee088d54https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper