PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 28, 2008Archives of Internal Medicine78 citations

Association of Exercise Capacity on Treadmill With Future Cardiac Events in Patients Referred for Exercise Testing

View Full Paper
PPPamela N. Peterson

Key Result

Lower exercise capacity (<85% of predicted) was associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (HR 2.36; 95% CI 1.55-3.60) compared with exercise capacity >100% of predicted.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=9,191)

Structured PICO

Does lower exercise capacity predict future cardiac events in patients referred for exercise testing?

P
Population
9,191 patients referred for exercise treadmill testing, followed for a median of 2.7 years.
E
Exposure
Lower exercise capacity (<85% of age- and sex-predicted metabolic equivalents)
C
Comparator
Exercise capacity greater than 100% of predicted
O
Outcome
Individual primary outcomes of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and coronary revascularizationhard clinical

Reduced exercise capacity on treadmill testing is strongly associated with an increased risk of nonfatal cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 2.36 (95% CI 1.55–3.6)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between exercise capacity and nonfatal cardiac events in patients referred for exercise treadmill testing (ETT). Our objective was to determine the prognostic importance of exercise capacity for nonfatal cardiac events in a clinical population. METHODS: A cohort study was performed of 9191 patients referred for ETT. Median follow-up was 2.7 years. Exercise capacity was quantified as the proportion of age- and sex-predicted metabolic equivalents achieved and categorized as less than 85%, 85% to 100%, and greater than 100%. Individual primary outcomes were myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and coronary revascularization. All-cause mortality was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Patients with lower exercise capacity were more likely to be female (55.38% vs 42.62%); to have comorbidities such as diabetes (23.16% vs 9.61%) and hypertension (59.43% vs 44.05%); and to have abnormal ETT findings such as chest pain on the treadmill (12.09% vs 7.63%), abnormal heart rate recovery (82.74% vs 64.13%), and abnormal chronotropic index (32.89% vs 12.20%). In multivariable analysis, including other ETT variables, lower exercise capacity (<85% of predicted) was associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio HR, 2.36; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.55-3.60), unstable angina (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.78-3.21), coronary revascularization (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.46- 2.08), and all-cause mortality (HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.88-4.47) compared with exercise capacity greater than 100% of predicted. CONCLUSION: Adjusting for patient characteristics and other ETT variables, reduced exercise capacity was associated with both nonfatal cardiovascular events and mortality in patients referred for ETT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pamela N. Peterson (2008) conducted a cohort in patients referred for exercise treadmill testing (n=9,191). Lower exercise capacity (<85% of predicted) vs. Exercise capacity greater than 100% of predicted was evaluated on myocardial infarction (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.55-3.60). Lower exercise capacity (<85% of predicted) was associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (HR 2.36; 95% CI 1.55-3.60) compared with exercise capacity >100% of predicted.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a705f302163a0a01bc496d9https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2007.68
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper