PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 15, 1992Cancer82 citationsOpen Access

Treatment of childhood germ cell tumors: Review of the St. Jude experience from 1979 to 1988

View Full Paper
NMNeyssa MarinaJFJames FontanesiLKLarry Kun

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The outlook for patients with germ cell tumors was poor before the advent of effective chemotherapy. The authors assessed the outcome of treatment with multiagent chemotherapy (with or without radiation therapy) in children treated for germ cell tumors at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH). METHODS: Sixty children with germ cell tumors were treated between January 1979 and June 1988. Postsurgical treatment was based on tumor site, stage, and histology. Most patients received chemotherapy with vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide (VAC), or a modified Einhorn regimen (cisplatin, bleomycin, and vinblastine PVB); in the absence of response to initial therapy, patients received alternating courses of VAC and PVB (VAC/PVB regimen). Exceptions were patients with Stage I testicular tumors (observation only) and ovarian germinomas (Stage I tumors measuring less than 10 cm, observation only; tumors larger than 10 cm or Stage II-III disease, radiation only; and Stage IV disease, VAC plus radiation). RESULTS: The estimated 5-year survival is 100% for patients with Stage I disease (n = 18), 87% for patients with Stage II (n = 8), 72% for Stage III (n = 25), and 56% for Stage IV (n = 9). Patients with testicular tumors of any stage or with Stage I-II ovarian tumors had 100% 5-year survival. Extragonadal tumors responded poorly to VAC alone with recurrent or progressive disease in eight of nine patients. Treatment for those tumors was changed to alternating courses of VAC and PVB, which failed in only one of seven patients. Nine of 19 patients with advanced ovarian tumors had disease recurrence with VAC; these patients then received PVB, which was effective in four cases. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with advanced germ cell cancers, intensification of therapy or the development of new approaches is necessary. In contrast, future trials in children with limited stage should focus on reducing acute and long-term toxicities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marina et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7068aee36a167817e22fa0https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19921115)70:10<2568::aid-cncr2820701028>3.0.co;2-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Immature (malignant) teratoma of the ovary.A clinical and pathologic study of 58 cases1976 · 638 citations
  2. 2Cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum, Vinblastine, and Bleomycin Combination Chemotherapy in Disseminated Testicular Cancer1977 · 1,558 citations
  3. 3High-dose platinum consisting of combined carboplatin and cisplatin in previously untreated ovarian cancer patients with residual disease.1989 · 71 citations
  4. 4Endodermal sinus tumor of the ovary.A clinical and pathologic analysis of 71 cases1976 · 434 citations
  5. 5Testicular Cancer in Children1980 · 57 citations