PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1999Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research54 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of three methods for the determination of baroreflex sensitivity in conscious rats

VFVera FarahEMEdson Duarte MoreiraMPMara Dias Pires

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the effects of three different drug administration methods on baroreflex sensitivity in conscious rats.
  • Vasoactive drugs were administered using bolus injection, steady-state, and ramp infusion methods.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Conscious rats
I
Intervention
Vasoactive drugs (phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside) administered by three different approaches: 1) bolus injection, 2) steady-state (blood pressure changes produced in steps), 3) ramp infusion (30 s, brief infusion)
C
Comparator
Comparison between the three administration approaches
O
Outcome
Baroreflex sensitivity (heart rate responses to blood pressure changes evaluated by mean index, linear regression, and logistic method)surrogate

Short-duration blood pressure changes (bolus and ramp infusion up to 30 s) are more appropriate for preventing acute resetting when assessing baroreflex sensitivity in conscious rats.

Abstract

Baroreflex sensitivity was studied in the same group of conscious rats using vasoactive drugs (phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside) administered by three different approaches: 1) bolus injection, 2) steady-state (blood pressure (BP) changes produced in steps), 3) ramp infusion (30 s, brief infusion). The heart rate (HR) responses were evaluated by the mean index (mean ratio of all HR changes and mean arterial pressure (MAP) changes), by linear regression and by the logistic method (maximum gain of the sigmoid curve by a logistic function). The experiments were performed on three consecutive days. Basal MAP and resting HR were similar on all days of the study. Bradycardic responses evaluated by the mean index (-1.5 +/- 0.2, -2.1 +/- 0.2 and -1.6 +/- 0.2 bpm/mmHg) and linear regression (-1.8 +/- 0.3, -1.4 +/- 0.3 and -1.7 +/- 0.2 bpm/mmHg) were similar for all three approaches used to change blood pressure. The tachycardic responses to decreases of MAP were similar when evaluated by linear regression (-3.9 +/- 0.8, -2.1 +/- 0.7 and -3.8 +/- 0.4 bpm/mmHg). However, the tachycardic mean index (-3.1 +/- 0.4, -6.6 +/- 1 and -3.6 +/- 0.5 bpm/mmHg) was higher when assessed by the steady-state method. The average gain evaluated by logistic function (-3.5 +/- 0.6, -7.6 +/- 1.3 and -3.8 +/- 0.4 bpm/mmHg) was similar to the reflex tachycardic values, but different from the bradycardic values. Since different ways to change BP may alter the afferent baroreceptor function, the MAP changes obtained during short periods of time (up to 30 s: bolus and ramp infusion) are more appropriate to prevent the acute resetting. Assessment of the baroreflex sensitivity by mean index and linear regression permits a separate analysis of gain for reflex bradycardia and reflex tachycardia. Although two values of baroreflex sensitivity cannot be evaluated by a single symmetric logistic function, this method has the advantage of better comparing the baroreflex sensitivity of animals with different basal blood pressures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Farah et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70738535aa2c282ce1c574https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x1999000300018
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper