PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 16, 2012AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology34 citations

Functional differences between junctional and extrajunctional adrenergic receptor activation in mammalian ventricle

OAOlujimi A. AjijolaMVMarmar VaseghiWZWei Zhou

Key Result

Bilateral sympathetic stimulation caused nonuniform ARI shortening (0.9 vs 0.56; P=0.03), differing from the regional effects of norepinephrine (0.91 vs 0.63; P=0.003) in porcine ventricles.

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine the functional differences between sympathetic nerve stimulation and adrenergic receptor activation in porcine ventricles.
  • Bilateral sympathetic stimulation (BSS) and norepinephrine (NE) administration were performed on Yorkshire pigs (n=13).
  • A 56-electrode sock recorded epicardial electrograms for measuring activation recovery intervals (ARIs) before and during interventions.
  • ARI shortening was analyzed to assess functional nerve and adrenergic receptor densities.
  • During BSS, ARI shortening was greatest in the mid-basal lateral right ventricle (0.9 ± 0.08) compared to the midposterior left ventricle (0.56 ± 0.08; P=0.03).
  • NE administration resulted in more significant ARI shortening in the LV apex (0.91 ± 0.04) compared to basal segments (0.63 ± 0.05; P=0.003).
  • Dispersion of ARIs increased in 50% of subjects during BSS and 60% during NE administration, indicating varied responses.

Structured PICO

P
Population
13 female Yorkshire pigs undergoing surgical exposure of the heart and stellate ganglia to evaluate functional differences in cardiac sympathetic activation.
I
Intervention
Bilateral sympathetic stimulation (BSS) (n=8) or norepinephrine (NE) administration (1-2 mcg/kg) (n=5)
C
Comparator
Baseline conditions prior to stimulation or administration
O
Outcome
Activation recovery intervals (ARIs) shortening measured via 56-electrode epicardial socksurrogate

Efferent sympathetic nerve activity and circulating catecholamines produce distinct regional electrophysiological effects in the mammalian ventricle, suggesting they activate different pools of adrenergic receptors.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.003

Limitations

  • Species differences between porcine and other models (e.g., rabbit)
  • Intact neuraxis model may differ from decentralized preparations
  • Short stimulation times (300 s)

Abstract

Increased cardiac sympathetic activation worsens dispersion of repolarization and is proarrhythmic. The functional differences between intrinsic nerve stimulation and adrenergic receptor activation remain incompletely understood. This study was undertaken to determine the functional differences between efferent cardiac sympathetic nerve stimulation and direct adrenergic receptor activation in porcine ventricles. Female Yorkshire pigs (n = 13) underwent surgical exposure of the heart and stellate ganglia. A 56-electrode sock was placed over the ventricles to record epicardial electrograms. Animals underwent bilateral sympathetic stimulation (BSS) (n = 8) or norepinephrine (NE) administration (n = 5). Activation recovery intervals (ARIs) were measured at each electrode before and during BSS or NE. The degree of ARI shortening during BSS or NE administration was used as a measure of functional nerve or adrenergic receptor density. During BSS, ARI shortening was nonuniform across the epicardium (F value 9.62, P = 0.003), with ARI shortening greatest in the mid-basal lateral right ventricle and least in the midposterior left ventricle (LV) (mean normalized values: 0.9 ± 0.08 vs. 0.56 ± 0.08; P = 0.03). NE administration resulted in greater ARI shortening in the LV apex than basal segments 0.91 ± 0.04 vs. 0.63 ± 0.05 (averaged basal segments); P = 0.003. Dispersion of ARIs increased in 50% and 60% of the subjects undergoing BSS and NE, respectively, but decreased in the others. There is nonuniform response to cardiac sympathetic activation of both porcine ventricles, which is not fully explained by adrenergic receptor density. Different pools of adrenergic receptors may mediate the cardiac electrophysiological effects of efferent sympathetic nerve activity and circulating catecholamines.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ajijola et al. (2012) studied Cardiac sympathetic activation (n=13). Bilateral sympathetic stimulation (BSS) vs. Norepinephrine (NE) administration was evaluated on Activation recovery interval (ARI) shortening (p=0.003). Bilateral sympathetic stimulation caused nonuniform ARI shortening (0.9 vs 0.56; P=0.03), differing from the regional effects of norepinephrine (0.91 vs 0.63; P=0.003) in porcine ventricles.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7077d7f44fa9f079de1e7ahttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00754.2012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Local ventricular repolarization changes due to sympathetic nerve-branch stimulation1975 · 111 citations
  2. 2Functional Distribution of Right and Left Stellate Innervation to the Ventricles1966 · 526 citations
  3. 3Correlation between in vivo transmembrane action potential durations and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms. Effects of interventions that alter repolarization time.1990 · 401 citations
  4. 4Correlation between refractory periods and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms: effects of rate and adrenergic interventions.1985 · 251 citations
  5. 5Reentrant ventricular arrhythmias in the late myocardial infarction period in the dog. 13. Correlation of activation and refractory maps.1985 · 191 citations