PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2010Journal of Materials Chemistry637 citations

Product integration of compact roll-to-roll processed polymer solar cell modules: methods and manufacture using flexographic printing, slot-die coating and rotary screen printing

View Full Paper
FKFrederik C. KrebsJFJan FyenboMJMikkel Jørgensen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The improvement of the performance of roll-to-roll processed polymer solar cell modules through miniaturization of the device outline is described. The devices were prepared using full roll-to-roll processing comprising flexographic printing, slot-die coating and rotary screen printing to create 5 mm wide lines of ZnO, P3HT:60/70PCBM, PEDOT:PSS and silver on an ITO-PET substrate. The lines were spaced by 1 mm and the devices were completed by encapsulation using roll-to-roll lamination on both sides using a pressure sensitive adhesive and a multilayered barrier material having a UV-filter with a cut-off at 390 nm, oxygen and water vapor transmission rates of respectively 0.01 cm3 m−2 bar−1 day−1 and 0.04 g m−2 day−1. The final modules comprised 16 serially connected cells. The technical yield was 89% based on the criterion that the Voc had to be larger than 7.2 V. This set of modules gave respectively a voltage, current, fill factor and power conversion efficiency of 8.47 ± 0.41 V, −23.20 ± 4.10 mA, 35.4 ± 2.8% and 1.96 ± 0.34% in the case of modules based on P3HT:60PCBM. A total of 1960 modules were prepared for each run and the best power conversion reached was 2.75% for devices based on P3HT:70PCBM. The solar cell modules were used to demonstrate the complete manufacture of a small lamp entirely using techniques of flexible electronics. The solar cell module was used to charge a polymer lithium ion battery through a blocking diode. The entire process was fully automated and demonstrates the capacity of polymer solar cells in the context of flexible and printed electronics. Finally a comparison was made between the learning curve for OPV and crystalline silicon solar cells in terms of the cost per watt peak and the cumulative watt peak. OPV as a technology was found to have a significantly steeper learning curve.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krebs et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70960ce5469ee92be14a84https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm01178a
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Grid-connected polymer solar panels: initial considerations of cost, lifetime, and practicality2010 · 115 citations
  2. 2Accuracy of progress ratios determined from experience curves: the case of crystalline silicon photovoltaic module technology development2007 · 65 citations
  3. 3Polymer solar cells: screen printing as a novel deposition technique2004 · 11 citations
  4. 4Pad printing as a film forming technique for polymer solar cells2008 · 66 citations
  5. 5Business, market and intellectual property analysis of polymer solar cells2010 · 361 citations